Bug#520944: Novell bug report about the issue

To: Chris Cheney <ccheney@debian.org>, 520944@bugs.debian.org
Cc: 520944@bugs.debian.org
Subject: Bug#520944: Novell bug report about the issue
From: Rene Engelhard <rene@debian.org>
Date: Tue, 24 Mar 2009 08:03:46 +0100
Message-id: <20090324070346.GA29776@rene-engelhard.de>
Reply-to: Rene Engelhard <rene@debian.org>, 520944@bugs.debian.org
In-reply-to: <1237861480.11639.4.camel@x200>
References: <1237861480.11639.4.camel@x200>

Hi,

Chris Cheney wrote:
> Apparently they did not fix this in ooo-build-3-0-1 for whatever
> reason...
> 
> https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=448776

how exactly does that have to do with 520944? In 3.0.1 it works.
In 3.1 it does not. With Python 2.*5*.

When I build with python 2.6 I of course add this patch, but this
is not relevant to this bug.

Grüße/Regards,

René
-- 
 .''`.  René Engelhard -- Debian GNU/Linux Developer
 : :' : http://www.debian.org | http://people.debian.org/~rene/
 `. `'  rene@debian.org | GnuPG-Key ID: 248AEB73
   `-   Fingerprint: 41FA F208 28D4 7CA5 19BB  7AD9 F859 90B0 248A EB73

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Bug#520944: Novell bug report about the issue
  - From: Rene Engelhard <rene@debian.org>

References:
- Bug#520944: Novell bug report about the issue
  - From: Chris Cheney <ccheney@debian.org>

Prev by Date: Bug#520611: openoffice.org: package synopsis should not repeat package name
Next by Date: Bug#520611: openoffice.org: package synopsis should not repeat package name
Previous by thread: Bug#520944: Novell bug report about the issue
Next by thread: Bug#520944: Novell bug report about the issue
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread