--- Begin Message ---
Package: openoffice.org-core
Severity: serious
Version: 1:3.0.1-3
Hi,
Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
> what I get is
>
> |~# apt-get dist-upgrade
> |Reading package lists... Done
> |Building dependency tree
> |Reading state information... Done
> |Calculating upgrade... Done
> |The following packages have been kept back:
> | openoffice.org-core shared-mime-info
> |0 upgraded, 0 newly installed, 0 to remove and 2 not upgraded.
> |~# apt-get install openoffice.org-core
> |Reading package lists... Done
> |Building dependency tree
> |Reading state information... Done
> |Some packages could not be installed. This may mean that you have
> |requested an impossible situation or if you are using the unstable
> |distribution that some required packages have not yet been created
> |or been moved out of Incoming.
> |The following information may help to resolve the situation:
> |
> |The following packages have unmet dependencies:
> | openoffice.org-core: Depends: libicu40 (>= 4.0-1) but it is not installable
> |E: Broken packages
> |~# apt-get install libicu40
> |Reading package lists... Done
> |Building dependency tree
> |Reading state information... Done
> |Package libicu40 is not available, but is referred to by another package.
> |This may mean that the package is missing, has been obsoleted, or
> |is only available from another source
> |E: Package libicu40 has no installation candidate
And why is this posted to #516084? Which talks about a mixture between 2.4.1 and 3.0.1
possible which fails install? Not about 3.0.1-3 built against an experimental package.
Please post unrelated messages for other bufs to unrelated and closed bugs without reason,
thanks.
But yes, it seems I accidentially built against libicu40.
Kurt, can we bin-NMU openoffice.org in sid against libicu38?
> So we could either to rebuild against the icu version sid (if possible)
That should be preferred...
> or migrate icu40 from exp into sid. According to the buildd log [1], libicu
> is not the only package which is not (yet) migrated.
It is. There's no buildlog for amd64 because I build it, and if I built it
in a clean sid it would have worked... (i.e. it would have gotten a dep on libicu38...)
> Is this something worth to reopen or this or should I open wishlist bug
No way for reopen. The bugs are different. If at all a new bug against OOo.
> against icu (and other libs missing)?
Nope, it's a OOo bug.
[ Nevertheless, icu 4.0 should be uploaded to sid when the release team agrees with it ]
Grüße/Regards,
René
--
.''`. René Engelhard -- Debian GNU/Linux Developer
: :' : http://www.debian.org | http://people.debian.org/~rene/
`. `' rene@debian.org | GnuPG-Key ID: 248AEB73
`- Fingerprint: 41FA F208 28D4 7CA5 19BB 7AD9 F859 90B0 248A EB73
--- End Message ---