[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#514112: Openoffice 2.4 (lenny) crashes when opening template files from ooffice 2.0.4



Hi,

Kerstin Hoef-Emden wrote:
>>> From one day to the other, openoffice started crashing when I tried 
>>> to 
> open a spreadsheet.ots that has been set up under openoffice 2.0 from  
> etch. It asks for a recovery of files, then upon opening crashes no  
> matter whether I tell it to recover or not. All other spreadsheets that  
> I tried to open thereafter, crashed, too. I have tried to solve the  
> problem by renaming the .openoffice.org2 directory and by completely  
> reinstalling the office suite together with the German menu package and  
> the German help file. Current status is that I can open all other files,  
> but it still crashes when trying to open the *.ots file from openoffice  
> 2.0.4. The file itself is not damaged, since it still can be opened by  
> openoffice 2.0.4 and causes openoffice 2.4 to crash when I copy it to  
> the other computer with the lenny install. Apparently, ooffice2.4 cannot  
> handle this file, which is simply an empty template with formulas to  
> compute averages, standard deviations and min and max values for data  
> that are supposed to be inserted in future.
>
> When I double-click the file to open it directly, the error message is:  
> "Durch einen unerwarteten Fehler ist OpenOffice.org abgestürzt. ... Die  
> folgenden Dokumente werden wieder hergestellt:" (= OpenOffice.org  
> crashed due to an unexpected error. ... The following documents will be  
> recovered.)

I bet this is the same as #513743 / #513482. Can you confirm?
(Run gdb /usr/lib/openoffice/program/soffice.bin, enter run, <do stuff>,
enter bt when the crash happened)

Grüße/Regards,

René
-- 
 .''`.  René Engelhard -- Debian GNU/Linux Developer
 : :' : http://www.debian.org | http://people.debian.org/~rene/
 `. `'  rene@debian.org | GnuPG-Key ID: 248AEB73
   `-   Fingerprint: 41FA F208 28D4 7CA5 19BB  7AD9 F859 90B0 248A EB73




Reply to: