Bug#513743: OO-calc bug
- To: Eike Rathke <er@openoffice.org>, yortx.barry@gmail.com, 513743@bugs.debian.org, 513743-submitter@bugs.debian.org
- Cc: kr@openoffice.org, sb@openoffice.org
- Subject: Bug#513743: OO-calc bug
- From: Rene Engelhard <rene@debian.org>
- Date: Tue, 3 Feb 2009 14:14:17 +0100
- Message-id: <[🔎] 20090203131417.GN10984@rene-engelhard.de>
- Mail-followup-to: Eike Rathke <er@openoffice.org>, yortx.barry@gmail.com, 513743@bugs.debian.org, 513743-submitter@bugs.debian.org, kr@openoffice.org, sb@openoffice.org
- Reply-to: Rene Engelhard <rene@debian.org>, 513743@bugs.debian.org
- In-reply-to: <[🔎] 20090203092917.GA17232@ulungele.germany.sun.com>
- References: <[🔎] 200902010317.13862.yortx.barry@gmail.com> <[🔎] 20090201143749.GC14273@rene-engelhard.de> <[🔎] 20090201235659.GA17831@rene-engelhard.de> <[🔎] 20090203092917.GA17232@ulungele.germany.sun.com>
Hi,
Eike Rathke wrote:
> On Monday, 2009-02-02 00:57:01 +0100, Rene Engelhard wrote:
>
> > To be honest, I don't have a clue about this. Eike, Stephan/Kay, any idea?
>
> No other than some yet unknown sort of memory corruption or misplaced
> instruction. libcomphelp4gcc3.so was mentioned to solve this when
> replaced. What changed between -15 and -17 and its compilation?
Escept the fix for the hidden text problem nothing in the code did change
between -15 and -16 (where it arrived). But gcc got a upgrade :-(
(As said in a later post, compiling with an older gcc works...)
And it happens for ! Calc, too...
> Rene, are you going to FOSDEM? Maybe we could dive into that if not
> solved by then.
Sorry, no, at some other other conference in Berlin.
Grüße/Regards,
René
--
.''`. René Engelhard -- Debian GNU/Linux Developer
: :' : http://www.debian.org | http://people.debian.org/~rene/
`. `' rene@debian.org | GnuPG-Key ID: 248AEB73
`- Fingerprint: 41FA F208 28D4 7CA5 19BB 7AD9 F859 90B0 248A EB73
Reply to: