[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#512792: mimetype icons don't adhere to the Icon Naming Specification



Package: openoffice.org-common
Version: 1:3.0.0-6
Severity: normal

Hi,
the icons installed in
/usr/share/icons/{hicolor,locolor,gnome}/*/*/openofficeorg3*png don't
adhere to freedesktop.org's Icon Naming Specification [1]. They should
be named according to the mime types specified in
/usr/share/mime/packages/openoffice.org.xml:

application-vnd.oasis.opendocument.<subtype>.png

A simple:

ln -s /usr/share/icons/hicolor/16x16/mimetypes/openofficeorg3-oasis-text.png \
  /usr/share/icons/hicolor/16x16/mimetypes/application-vnd.oasis.opendocument.text.png

shows that this "works" as expected and the icons get picked up e.g. in
the GtkFileChooser and KDE [2]. No other application in Debian provides
icons for that mime type in the above three themes. So if this looks
o.k. I'll be happy to cook up a patch.
Cheers,
 -- Guido

[1] http://standards.freedesktop.org/icon-naming-spec/icon-naming-spec-latest.html
]2] if KDE uses the hicolor icon theme

-- System Information:
Debian Release: 5.0
  APT prefers testing
  APT policy: (500, 'testing'), (50, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: powerpc (ppc)

Kernel: Linux 2.6.28-rc8-00058-g921171e
Locale: LANG=de_DE.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=de_DE.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash

Versions of packages openoffice.org-common depends on:
ii  dictionaries-common [openoffi 0.98.12    Common utilities for spelling dict
ii  openoffice.org-style-galaxy   1:3.0.0-6  Galaxy (Default) symbol style for 

Versions of packages openoffice.org-common recommends:
ii  openoffice.org-style-crystal  1:3.0.0-6  Crystal symbol style for OpenOffic
ii  openoffice.org-style-tango    1:3.0.0-6  Tango symbol style for OpenOffice.

Versions of packages openoffice.org-common suggests:
pn  openoffice.org-style-hicontra <none>     (no description available)
pn  openoffice.org-style-industri <none>     (no description available)

-- no debconf information



Reply to: