[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

./packages/openofficeorg/3.0/experimental r1259: also complain in binary-indep when Mono is disabled



------------------------------------------------------------
revno: 1259
committer: Rene Engelhard <rene@debian.org>
branch nick: debian
timestamp: Thu 2008-09-18 14:41:39 +0200
message:
  also complain in binary-indep when Mono is disabled
modified:
  changelog
  rules
=== modified file 'changelog'
--- a/changelog	2008-09-18 09:57:21 +0000
+++ b/changelog	2008-09-18 12:41:39 +0000
@@ -21,6 +21,7 @@
     - temporarily disable report-builder as reportbuilder module is not
       available in the tarballs yet...
     - --with-java-target-version=1.5 for builds with openjdk/cacao-oj6
+    - also complain in binary-indep when Mono is disabled
   * debian/control.reportdesign.in:
     - depend on OOo base and java-common with >= ${base-version} and conflict
       against them with >= ${base-version}.1. According to the bug this
@@ -29,7 +30,7 @@
   * debian/openoffice.org-presentation-minimizer.preinst.in: oops, fix version
     comparison
 
- -- Rene Engelhard <rene@debian.org>  Thu, 18 Sep 2008 11:56:21 +0200
+ -- Rene Engelhard <rene@debian.org>  Thu, 18 Sep 2008 14:39:48 +0200
 
 openoffice.org (1:3.0.0~ooo300m3-3) experimental; urgency=low
 

=== modified file 'rules'
--- a/rules	2008-09-18 06:23:42 +0000
+++ b/rules	2008-09-18 12:41:39 +0000
@@ -3150,6 +3150,11 @@
 	echo "For uploads with binary-all packages, please use arches where Java is enabled!!!!!"
 	echo "!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!"
 endif
+ifneq ($(ARCH),$(findstring $(ARCH),$(OOO_MONO_ARCHS)))
+        echo "!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!"
+        echo "For uploads with binary-all packages, please use arches where Mono is enabled!!!!!"
+        echo "!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!"
+endif
 	dh_testdir
 	dh_testroot
 


Reply to: