[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#504133: Fails to unprotect table cells (not found in Sun's OO)



Excuse me, but, are you drunk today? Did you sleep badly? Are you stressed by examinations? Do you not include enough fibre in your diet? :-)

Do you think that, with this disdain and arrogance, you will encourage people to submit bugs? I cannot believe it indeed, it looks like a hidden-camera joke. Anyway, let us go:

get a full name, please.

My full name is in the "from" field of my email. Is it relevant for the bug?
 

Why didn't you mark it appropriately then? ;-)
It's currently marked as found in >= 2.4.1-11 only.
(And 3.0.0-x is branched off 2.4.1-7)

I chose the current testing version, because my memory is not so good to remember the first version in Debian. True, I could have gone to the developer information, but, at the time I submitted it (daybreak), I would have preferred not to submit it if I had to spend time in the history of the package. In such case, by the way, I would have avoided your rudeness :-)
 

Aha. And because you have written it there you can't write it
down in this bug, too istewad of pointing to a (waaah!) forum? ;-)

Thanks to this forum you are looking down on we were able to found that the problem is specific of Go-OO. I think this is a valuable piece of information. Do you not think so? 


How should one reading this bug offline (bts cache) look at the infos ;-)
All the infos relevant to the bug belong into the bug.

I refer again to two paragraphs above. Regard the submission of this bug as a courtesy to you :-P Furthermore, the title of the bug is self-explanatory :-P


(And BTW, you didn't report it to Go-Oo yet, the BTS for go-oo upstream stuff
is not the Debian BTS - we are just one user of go-oo.org. If you want
to report it on go-oo.org upstream file it in bugzilla.novell.com, as
always it's better if the person who found it does it him/herself then
the Debian person playing proxy or just forwarding it and forgetting about it)
)

Yes, I learnt myself that submitting to the upstream is quicker. But Debian's bug submitting guidelines do not say anything about that, so do not assume that people will guess it.


> I am not submitting it as grave because such severity is not justified, but

I'd have downgraded it immediately anyway.

I already said I was NOT submitting it as grave. Calm down, kids :-P
 

Yes, we do. Unless you can tell us why this is release-critical, why we
should stop the release for it - and I guess you have the fix already for it?

No, I am not such a skilled programmer.

David

Reply to: