[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#219492: marked as done (openoffice.org: Mail merge doesn't blank fields correctly)



Your message dated Wed, 15 Aug 2007 23:35:13 +0300
with message-id <E1ILPaD-0001nI-QF@localhost>
and subject line Debian Openoffice.org bug triage - bug #219492
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--- Begin Message ---
Package: openoffice.org
Version: 1.1.0-1
Severity: normal


A database query on our client database produces two sets of fields, shiptoX and X. Sometimes a
shiptoX field is blank, and in that case we want to use the X field.

I insert a bunch of conditional text fields, each of which is condition:
[Ledger.InvoiceQuery.shiptoX], then: Ledger.InvoiceQuery.shiptoX else: Ledger.InvoiceQuery.X

When I merge a group of records, sometimes one record will have neither shiptoX nor X. In that case,
that record gets the value of the corresponding field from the previous merged item. (In the case
where two or three records have the same blank fields, the ghost entry gets copied forward
repeatedly).

Because I am already using a condition text to fill in the field, I cannot use a condition text to
hide the field if it isn't there.

This makes it impossible to use the mail-merge feature on sparse databases!

cheers, Rich.

-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
Architecture: i386
Kernel: Linux lin-pc 2.4.21-4-586tsc #1 Sat Aug 2 22:22:21 EST 2003 i686
Locale: LANG=en_GB.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_GB.UTF-8

Versions of packages openoffice.org depends on:
ii  dictionaries-common           0.15.4     Common utilities for spelling dict
ii  openoffice.org-bin            1.1.0-1    OpenOffice.org office suite binary
ii  openoffice.org-debian-files   1.1.0-1+2  Debian specific parts of OpenOffic
ii  openoffice.org-l10n-en [openo 1.1.0-1    English (US) language package for 

-- no debconf information



--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Version: 2.2.1-7

Dear openoffice.org user,

Thanks for your interest in OO.org and the bug report you have contributed.

Your bug report [0] was done for a version which is now quite old (pre
version 2.0.0).

During the last 6 weeks I sent 3 requests to update this bug report, and verify
that this bug still exists with a more up to date version of OO.org.

Since the bug is quite old, and I didn't get any response regarding this bug, 
I'm closing it. I'm using the current unstable version for proving version info.

If you'll find this bug to still exist in a future version of OO.org, please 
reopen the bug and specify the affected version.. Let me know if you need help 
with this process.

[0] http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=219492

--
Lior Kaplan
kaplan@debian.org

--- End Message ---

Reply to: