Hi, Daniel Stenberg wrote: > On Sat, 15 Sep 2007, Rene Engelhard wrote: > >> I didn't. I just said that you was wrong saying globally that curl 7.17.0 >> doesn't break builds. In some circumstances it does. You also claimed >> without making an exception that you still supported the options "above." >> Which evidently is not true with -DCURL_NO_OLDIES > > You fiddled with the build so it breaks. You can mess it up in several > other ways to make it break too. I don't see how that makes it libcurl's > fault. You obviously haven't read my post. I didn't add that define. > libcurl supports and works fine with the error code you say it doesn't work > with. Not generally, no. As you said youself. > You broke the build. Not libcurl. Accept that and stop throwing dirt our > way. Read my last message again. I didn't. I even said I am just trying a build with that define removed (It just takes...). I just objected to you generalizing that the new curl does not break. It does when you use that define. That was not throwing dirt on your way but just a fact. I didn't say I objected to the analysis that that define was at ffault and I neither said I won't fix it by removing the define. Maybe you should actually read mails more careful. Grüße/Regards, René -- .''`. René Engelhard -- Debian GNU/Linux Developer : :' : http://www.debian.org | http://people.debian.org/~rene/ `. `' rene@debian.org | GnuPG-Key ID: 248AEB73 `- Fingerprint: 41FA F208 28D4 7CA5 19BB 7AD9 F859 90B0 248A EB73
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature