[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#281865: marked as done (openoffice.org does not pick the right glyphs from fonts)



Your message dated Wed, 15 Aug 2007 23:35:18 +0300
with message-id <E1ILPaI-0001qK-GD@localhost>
and subject line Debian Openoffice.org bug triage - bug #281865
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--- Begin Message ---
Package: lmodern
Version: 0.92-3

The lmodern provides Type1 fonts that look like the traditional EC fonts
for LaTeX. Those fonts are registered for use in X applications, e.g.
OpenOffice.


The problem is that the ecircumflex and eogonek characters are swapped ;
the same applies for Ecircumflex and Eogonek. A simple way to reproduce
this bug is to compose an ecircumflex (ê) in OpenOffice in, say, Times
font and then change the font to LMRoman10. It won't appear correctly.


I made a simple patch that fixes the pfb files involved. Just do :
	cd /usr/share/texmf/fonts/type1/public/lm 
	patch < lm-ecircumflex.patch


-- 
Benjamin Sigonneau
PhD student, LANDE project
IRISA-INRIA, Campus de Beaulieu, 35042 Rennes cedex, France
Tél: +33 (0) 2 99 84 73 29 

Attachment: lm-ecircumflex.patch
Description: Binary data


--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Version: 2.2.1-7

Dear openoffice.org user,

Thanks for your interest in OO.org and the bug report you have contributed.

Your bug report [0] was done for a version which is now quite old (pre
version 2.0.0).

During the last 6 weeks I sent 3 requests to update this bug report, and verify
that this bug still exists with a more up to date version of OO.org.

Since the bug is quite old, and I didn't get any response regarding this bug, 
I'm closing it. I'm using the current unstable version for proving version info.

If you'll find this bug to still exist in a future version of OO.org, please 
reopen the bug and specify the affected version.. Let me know if you need help 
with this process.

[0] http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=281865

--
Lior Kaplan
kaplan@debian.org

--- End Message ---

Reply to: