Hi, Bilderbeek, Manuel wrote: > > should want nfs-common, it may be related to bug #335742. Could the > > people who observed #335742 (CC'ed) please try to install nfs-common > > and see if this solves the NFS-related problems? > > Thank you very much for the suggestion! It seems that this indeed solves > the NFS problems, a quick test shows that I can't save a file to an NFS > mount before installing it and this worked fine after installing it. Good. > Please make it a dependency. Note that Ubuntu and possibly other distros No. Making it a dependency is nonsense for several reasons: a) people not using NFS don't need it. Why should they install it just to install OOo for usage on their local disks (or some other remote fses like s(s)hfs? b) a NFS without nfs-common installed and therefore the tools in there is bbrokenly configured anyway. Recommends: is enough. See the policy for the definition of Recommends, which doesn't even match here but Suggests (but that probably would go unnoticed at all) > have similar problems, might be nice to notify them as well. If you actually would have read the original message you would have seen where the "Recommend nfs-common" fix came from. [.. stripping off wasting disclaimer...] Gr??e/Regards, Ren? -- .''`. Ren? Engelhard -- Debian GNU/Linux Developer : :' : http://www.debian.org | http://people.debian.org/~rene/ `. `' rene@debian.org | GnuPG-Key ID: 248AEB73 `- Fingerprint: 41FA F208 28D4 7CA5 19BB 7AD9 F859 90B0 248A EB73
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature