Paolo wrote: > On Sun, Apr 22, 2007 at 03:09:11PM +0000, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote: > > > > Got remooved upstream. > > means that you're going to release a new version without such email settings > pane? how direct sendmail will be handled then? That example sucks since sendmail itself can't do proper MIME, can it? Everything OOo does is just composing a mail using the MUAs arguments/start the MUA. Encoding and ending out is then the MUAs job. There simply is no direct way to use sendmail directly. Yes, upstream sucks, but that's no news. > > You probably use GNOME and have evolution installed... Or just fall into the fallback. > > not at all, evolution(1) is there 'cauz of crazy dependnecies Then the fallback. > > > for configuring it. > > > > Wrong. If you can't think of the possibility to simply add whatever you like > > in that box, I am sorry, but. Because that is what the senddoc script checks: > > > > looking at senddoc.sh, It knows about: > > where is such senddoc.sh? is it a user config file? Do. It's a script. Not a config file. > # locate senddoc.sh > # find /usr/lib/openoffice/ -name senddoc.sh senndoc.sh is how it's called in the source, what's installed is /usr/lib/openoffice/program/senddoc. Which, with a bit of thinking - could have douns by you if you eitrher used senddoc* for searching or looked with ls. But I apologize for my typo. > nothing at all. > So, pls explain how a user is supposed to 'simply add whatever he likes in > that box'; the only box avail is that for the program name/path; also pls huh? Just add "kmail" or whatever you like there? What is difficult there? > > > user's setting/setup; second, and most important, what the heck means > > > > That setting never was a conffile system-wide, and the user profile dir changed. > > it's imported by OOo2 from OOo1, hence it's expected to keep its meaning/use. No, wrong. There's no configs imported from OOo1 to OOo2. > > > 'supported'? OOo should be neutral wrt helper apps - if it knows exactly how > > > to pass args to a handful progs, fine (but may put maint. overhead), like > > > > That's exactly what senddoc does. > > except that noone knows about that. And why is that a bug in the program? > > > must be a generic opt for the generic emailer/helper the end-user wants to > > > use, which would be called by > > > > This *is* what we try with this. At least for the generic desktop users. I don't like > > it does *not* do that: if it doesn't like the program name the user set in > the path box, it just bails out saying it's 'unsupported'. Because it *IS* unspported then. Gr�gards, Ren�- .''`. Ren�ngelhard -- Debian GNU/Linux Developer : :' : http://www.debian.org | http://people.debian.org/~rene/ `. `' rene@debian.org | GnuPG-Key ID: 248AEB73 `- Fingerprint: 41FA F208 28D4 7CA5 19BB 7AD9 F859 90B0 248A EB73
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature