[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#417076: marked as done (tango icons non-free? outdated information in debian/copyright.)

Your message dated Thu, 5 Apr 2007 14:21:51 +0200
with message-id <20070405122151.GA15492@rene-engelhard.de>
and subject line Bug#417076: tango icons non-free? outdated information in debian/copyright.
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--- Begin Message --- 
package: openoffice.org-style-tango
version: 2.2.0-1
severity: important

Hi Rene,

AFAICT the Tango icons are licensed under the 'CC by-sa 2.5' license
which is considered non-free by Debian (see tango-icon-theme package). I
do not know if the icons shipped with OOo are under the same license,
but if they are, at least this package would become non-free and make
OOo possibly contrib.

The copyright file for the OOo packages does not tell about the licenses
for the icon sets. Furthermore it states that the sources were obtained
from http://download.openoffice.org/1.1.0/source.html which reveals,
that the information contained in this file is outdated anyway.

However, if this is bug is false alarm, please accept my apology and
close it or downgrade severity appropriately. The debian/copyright file
should be reviewed nevertheless.

Cheers,
Fabian

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- 
Hi,

Fabian Greffrath wrote:
> AFAICT the Tango icons are licensed under the 'CC by-sa 2.5' license
> which is considered non-free by Debian (see tango-icon-theme package). I

The GNOME ones, yes.

> do not know if the icons shipped with OOo are under the same license,

No.

i just talked with "jimmac". The GNOME ones are CC-BY-SA 2.5 but the
OOo ones are thankfully LGPLed.

> The copyright file for the OOo packages does not tell about the licenses
> for the icon sets. Furthermore it states that the sources were obtained

Because, if they are LGPLed, it's covered by the LGPL already :)

> >from http://download.openoffice.org/1.1.0/source.html which reveals,
> that the information contained in this file is outdated anyway.

Not really, just that that line never got changed by updates..

> However, if this is bug is false alarm, please accept my apology and
> close it or downgrade severity appropriately. The debian/copyright file

Doing.

> should be reviewed nevertheless.

Yes.

Regards,

Rene
-- 
 .''`.  Ren�ngelhard -- Debian GNU/Linux Developer
 : :' : http://www.debian.org | http://people.debian.org/~rene/
 `. `'  rene@debian.org | GnuPG-Key ID: 248AEB73
   `-   Fingerprint: 41FA F208 28D4 7CA5 19BB  7AD9 F859 90B0 248A EB73

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


--- End Message ---
Reply to: