[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#322083: marked as done (Please switch to libxaw8)



Your message dated Mon, 9 Jan 2006 08:39:29 +0100
with message-id <20060109073928.GA29738@rene-engelhard.de>
and subject line won't do that
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 8 Aug 2005 23:56:26 +0000
>From bunk@stusta.de Mon Aug 08 16:56:26 2005
Return-path: <bunk@stusta.de>
Received: from emailhub.stusta.mhn.de (mailout.stusta.mhn.de) [141.84.69.5] 
	by spohr.debian.org with smtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
	id 1E2HTl-0007SM-00; Mon, 08 Aug 2005 16:56:26 -0700
Received: (qmail 28280 invoked from network); 8 Aug 2005 23:55:54 -0000
Received: from r063144.stusta.swh.mhn.de (10.150.63.144)
  by mailhub.stusta.mhn.de with SMTP; 8 Aug 2005 23:55:54 -0000
Received: by r063144.stusta.swh.mhn.de (Postfix, from userid 1000)
	id 54F9C1CE30C; Tue,  9 Aug 2005 01:55:52 +0200 (CEST)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Adrian Bunk <bunk@stusta.de>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <submit@bugs.debian.org>
Subject: openoffice.org-bin: Please switch to libxaw8
X-Mailer: reportbug 3.15
Date: Tue, 09 Aug 2005 01:55:51 +0200
Message-Id: <20050808235552.54F9C1CE30C@r063144.stusta.swh.mhn.de>
Delivered-To: submit@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
	(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE 
	autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02

Package: openoffice.org-bin
Version: 1.1.4-5
Severity: wishlist

Can you switch from libxaw7 to the more recent libxaw8?

TIA
Adrian

---------------------------------------
Received: (at 322083-done) by bugs.debian.org; 9 Jan 2006 07:40:11 +0000
>From rene.engelhard@gmx.de Sun Jan 08 23:40:11 2006
Return-path: <rene.engelhard@gmx.de>
Received: from mail.gmx.net ([213.165.64.21])
	by spohr.debian.org with smtp (Exim 4.50)
	id 1EvrdS-0004dZ-Nm
	for 322083-done@bugs.debian.org; Sun, 08 Jan 2006 23:40:11 -0800
Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 09 Jan 2006 07:39:38 -0000
Received: from dslb-084-056-127-126.pools.arcor-ip.net (EHLO frodo) [84.56.127.126]
  by mail.gmx.net (mp019) with SMTP; 09 Jan 2006 08:39:38 +0100
X-Authenticated: #1545045
Received: by frodo (Postfix, from userid 1000)
	id 6D513C4CEF; Mon,  9 Jan 2006 08:39:30 +0100 (CET)
Date: Mon, 9 Jan 2006 08:39:29 +0100
From: Rene Engelhard <rene@debian.org>
To: 322083-done@bugs.debian.org
Subject: won't do that
Message-ID: <20060109073928.GA29738@rene-engelhard.de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
	protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="ReaqsoxgOBHFXBhH"
Content-Disposition: inline
X-PGP-Key: 248AEB73
X-PGP-Fingerprint: 41FA F208 28D4 7CA5 19BB  7AD9 F859 90B0 248A EB73
Organization: The Debian Project
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11
X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
	(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no 
	version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02


--ReaqsoxgOBHFXBhH
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline

Hi,

switching to libxaw8 makes no sense since:

 - sarge doesn't have libxaw8 and neither does U*u and this would mean
   another build-depends conditional...

 - on a concidentially happening conversation on libxaw?-dev it was
   pointed out that libxaw8 is planned to be dropped in X.org 7.0...

-> I close this bug.

Regards,

Rene

--ReaqsoxgOBHFXBhH
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: Digital signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFDwhMw+FmQsCSK63MRAunHAJ9YS9FVHmUviwmcpztp7fgiJwCV6QCeJxLW
T93PyI+GkS/XLwcBuhXnguI=
=8/1Y
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--ReaqsoxgOBHFXBhH--



Reply to: