Bug#347195: Any progress?
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Rene Engelhard schrieb:
> Hi,
>
> Am Freitag, 10. November 2006 14:44 schrieb André Wendt:
>> is there any progress regarding this bug AT ALL? I haven't even got an
>> acknowledgement for OVER TEN MONTHS!
>
> You got one from the BTS.
Oh yeah, that's right. But what's new? It's always being acknowledged by
the BTS!
> I don't reply to any bug with "oh, yes, hmm.". And some not important bugs just
> slip under the radar, too.
>
>> I don't know why, I cannot imagine you can't reproduce this. I've
>> provided a detailed description how to reproduce it, and I would like to
>> receive a response, since this bug is still not fixed as of version 2.0.4-5!
>
> There are many other, more important things..
>
>> If I don't get a response on this within a week, I will raise the
>> severity to RC to finally get someone to talk to me! It can't be too
>
> Bullshit. I'd immediately downgrade this and behaviour like that is crap.
> It's per definition *not* release-critical.
Interesting, so you have the time to do that, but not for a simple
message like "This is not important, I'll fix it in 2010?"
Anyway, we might as well drop the subject here. You fix it when you have
the time -- I didn't know you maintain this package as well, and you
might really have more important things to do on other OO-packages, Rene.
Regards,
André
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iD8DBQFFVP1akDGKfHXexj8RAmseAJ9AmivHzjqQ8Rop4+9IUhfsMVx2KwCeKtV8
31wLqqEnLA9eDu9eqSCSwHM=
=vMyC
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Reply to: