[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#385222: closed by Rene Engelhard <rene@debian.org> (Re: Bug#385222: Subject: openoffice.org-common: provide a way to make splash screen and initial dialog boxes optional)



On Wed, Aug 30, 2006 at 04:19:09AM -0700, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote:
> Then just disable it? /etc/openoffice/sofficerc. Logo=0.

Thanks. Was this documented somewhere?
Is there a way to do this in userland?
I have a number of things in ~/.openoffice.org2 but this file does not
appear

> > -=-=-=
> > This document contains macros.
> > Execution of this macros[sic] is disabled due to the
> > current macro security setting. Therefore, some
> > functionality may not be available.
> > 
> >                    [OK]
> > -=-=-=
> > 
> > (Note the grammar error.)

Should this grammar error be notified upstream?

> Then change that setting to "Low" if you REALLY want..?
> (Tools->Options->Macro Security)

Oh, I see what you mean:

Tools > Options > Security > Macro Security...
-=-=-=
Low (not recommended)
All macros will be executed without confirmation. Use this setting only
if you
are certain that all documents that will be opened are safe.
-=-=-=

That works all right.

I would like a setting when no macro is ever executed, without prompting
me for anything/telling me about it.  I tried achieving this changing
this setting to "High" or "Very High". I wouldn't want OOo to execute
funny things if one day I choose to open a document from an unknown
source.

Another solution would be to tell me how to recognize macros in the
bundled files and how to to remove them (remember I build OOo files
myself from various parts). Or maybe ask OOo to tell me what these
macros are and maybe selecting among them the ones I want or not. I keep
trying to grep and comment them out but it does not work. However it
would still be useful to have a way to tell OOo to be silent about that,
without executing them nor producing a dialog box (a discrete message at
the bottom of the window or something could be enough).



Reply to: