[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Bug#385149: openoffice.org-base: oobase crashes when starting



Hello,

rob wrote:
> Subject: openoffice.org-base: oobase crashes when starting
> Package: openoffice.org-base
> Version: 2.0.3-6
> Severity: grave
> Justification: renders package unusable
> 
> *** Please type your report below this line ***
> 
> Starting from terminal gives: *** glibc detected *** free(): invalid
> pointer: 0xb61ed890 ***
> 
> Not sure if relevant but kernel patched with Ingo Molnar’s realtime
> preemption patch
> 
> 
> 
> 
> System Information:
> Debian Release: testing/unstable
>   APT prefers unstable
>   APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing')
> Architecture: i386 (i686)
> Shell:  /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
> Kernel: Linux 2.6.17-rt8test1
> Locale: LANG=en_GB.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_GB.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
> 
> Versions of packages openoffice.org-base depends on:
> ii  gij-4.1 [jav 4.1.1-10                    The GNU Java bytecode
> interpreter
> ii  java-gcj-com 1.0.56-2                    Java runtime environment
> using GIJ
> ii  libc6        2.3.6.ds1-4                 GNU C Library: Shared
> libraries
> ii  libgcc1      1:4.1.1-11                  GCC support library
> ii  libglib2.0-0 2.10.3-3                    The GLib library of C routines
> ii  libhsqldb-ja 1.8.0.2-2                   Java SQL database engine
> ii  libmdbtools  0.5.99.0.6pre1.0.20051109-3 mdbtools libraries
> ii  libstdc++6   4.1.1-11                    The GNU Standard C++
> Library v3
> ii  libstlport4. 4.6.2-3                     STLport C++ class library
> ii  openoffice.o 2.0.3-6                     OpenOffice.org office suite
> archit
> ii  openoffice.o 2.0.3-6                     OpenOffice.org office suite
> Java s
> ii  sun-j2sdk1.5 1.5.0+update07              Java(TM) 2 SDK, Standard
> Edition,
> 
> openoffice.org-base recommends no packages.
> 
> -- no debconf information
> 
> 
It works for me.

I can use Base on 2.0.3-6 from sid without a crash.

Mechtilde



Reply to: