[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#345125: openoffice.org: Openoffice 2.0 icon problem (wmaker related ?)



Package: openoffice.org
Version: 2.0.0-5
Severity: normal

Ever since Openoffice.org was stepped to version 2.0 in unstable the icons that were displayed in windowmaker looked all wrong. I've taken a screenshot it can be seen at: http://www.de-brauwer.be/wastebasket/ooicons.png The error occurs on all icons of all openoffice applications (haven't seen any other application/icon show the same behaviour). Notice that both the minimized and application icons on the left as those in the <alt> + <tab> program switch dialog are wrong. If I had to guess what the problem would be I'd guess that openoffice uses something odd to define the transparency in the icons. It probably doesn't belong here since it will be related to the library rendering the image (or perhaps windowmaker) but openoffice icons are the only icons showing these problems. So please move this bug if it isn't in the rightplace.

from dpkg -i:
wmaker 0.92.0-5   NeXTSTEP-like window manager for X



-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Shell:  /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.14
Locale: LANG=en_US, LC_CTYPE=en_US (charmap=ISO-8859-1)

Versions of packages openoffice.org depends on:
ii openoffice.org-base 2.0.0-5 OpenOffice.org office suite - data ii openoffice.org-calc 2.0.0-5 OpenOffice.org office suite - spre ii openoffice.org-core 2.0.0-5 OpenOffice.org office suite archit ii openoffice.org-draw 2.0.0-5 OpenOffice.org office suite - draw ii openoffice.org-impress 2.0.0-5 OpenOffice.org office suite - pres ii openoffice.org-java-common 2.0.0-5 OpenOffice.org office suite Java s ii openoffice.org-math 2.0.0-5 OpenOffice.org office suite - equa ii openoffice.org-writer 2.0.0-5 OpenOffice.org office suite - word

openoffice.org recommends no packages.

-- no debconf information

--
Elie De Brauwer




Reply to: