[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#343758: openoffice.org-base: HSQLDB access fails with "no hsqldb2.so in java.library.path"



Package: openoffice.org-base
Version: 2.0.0-5
Severity: important

Start oobase. In the dialog box that shows up, choose to create a new
database file. Any attempt to manipulate the database, such as
clicking on "Tables" to create tables gives a pop-up error message:
  
  The connection to the data source "New Database" could not be established
  no hsqldb2.so in java.library.path

Any further attempts to operate on the database give another pop-up
error message:

  The connection to the data source "New Database" could not be established
  java.lang.NoClassDefFoundError

This is fully reproducible on this computer but not on another system
with the same OpenOffice version.

-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
  APT prefers testing
  APT policy: (990, 'testing'), (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'stable'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Shell:  /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.14-thales
Locale: LANG=sv_SE.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=sv_SE.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)

Versions of packages openoffice.org-base depends on:
ii  libc6      2.3.5-8                       GNU C Library: Shared libraries an
ii  libgcc1    1:4.0.2-5                     GCC support library
ii  libglib2.0 2.8.3-1                       The GLib library of C routines
ii  libhsqldb- 1.8.0.2-1                     Java SQL database engine
ii  libmdbtool 0.5.99.0.6pre1.0.20050409-1.2 mdbtools libraries
ii  libstdc++6 4.0.2-5                       The GNU Standard C++ Library v3
ii  libstlport 4.6.2-3                       STLport C++ class library
ii  openoffice 2.0.0-5                       OpenOffice.org office suite archit
ii  openoffice 2.0.0-5                       OpenOffice.org office suite Java s
ii  sun-j2sdk1 1.5.0+update05                Java(TM) 2 SDK, Standard Edition, 

openoffice.org-base recommends no packages.

-- no debconf information



Reply to: