[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: ooqstart-gnome



Filip Van Raemdonck wrote:
> Hi all,
> 
> On Sun, Dec 11, 2005 at 10:09:26PM +0100, Rene Engelhard wrote:
> > 
> > given that you seem MIA
> 
> Since when? Where?

Huh?

http://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login=mechanix&comaint=yes looked pretty
self-telling... and given that you didn't even react to some RC bugs
since months, that you had many of your packages NMUed after you didn't
react to simple RC bugs...

(now #d-d tells me you had uploads in Aug, Sep and Nov which apparently
did slip through my radar, sorry)

on a unrelated note wrt libmdbtools you really should split the stuff,
upstream changed API/ABI in CVS and future OOo will use that API...)

> > the current ooqstart-gnome needs updates for OOo2 - because OOo2
> > changed interface and the openoffice.org 2.0.x-y packages conflict against
> > the current ooqstart-gnome in sid; not to mention that because of this
> > fact ooqstart-gnome will block OOo2 transition to testing - I decided to
> > hijack the package.[1]
> > 
> > IMHO it is best to maintain it inside the Debian OOo Team anyway because
> > the package is so closely related to OOo.
> > 
> > If you want, I can give if back to you though or I (or you yourself) can
> > add you to Uploaders:
> 
> Add me to uploaders then, if you will.

Ok, so I will change Maintainer: to debian-openoffice@lists.debian.org and add
Chris, you and me to Uploaders:

Regards,

Rene

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Reply to: