Re: 2.0?
> Hi,
>
> Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote:
>> What are the plans for packaging openoffice.org 2.0?
>
> Work in progress. There's already 1.9.114 debs in experimental. Help of
> course welcome :)
A minor but in those is that they provide broken symlinks
in /usr/share/man/man1, pointing to openoffice2.1 instead of
openoffice2.1.gz
Reply to:
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: 2.0?
- From: Rene Engelhard <rene@debian.org>
- References:
- 2.0?
- From: Thomas Bushnell BSG <tb@becket.net>
- Re: 2.0?
- From: Rene Engelhard <rene@debian.org>