[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#311320: openoffice.org: Need openoffice version 2 (at least in experimental)



Hi,

Andrei Emeltchenko wrote:
> I cannot find openoffice version 2 despite it exists in all
> other distributions. Why in unstable some
> packages are about 1 year old?

rotfl. OOo2 is not relased. The latest stable is 1.1.x of which 1.1.4
*is* in experimental.

The 1.9.x stuff is *BETA*, of which I sometimes would even call "alpha".

I don't care whether other distributions are shipping OOo 1.9.x, they
sometimes do premature packaging or use non-free Java (which we can't).
And we don't want to disable Java in our OOo2 packages.

There's still some build issues and some integration issues to do...
(I just ran into a build break on ppc FWIW which is a arch I don't want to
ignore, sorry...). 

Saying that Debian is 1 year behind is pure nonsense if you mean OOo. If
you mean other packages, well, there are reasons for many...

Regards,

Rene

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Reply to: