Bug#296087: So why is the EULA included?

To: 296087@bugs.debian.org, control@bugs.debian.org
Subject: Bug#296087: So why is the EULA included?
From: dpt@lotus.bostoncoop.net (Dylan Thurston)
Date: Mon, 21 Feb 2005 16:59:40 -0500
Message-id: <[🔎] 20050221215940.GA5521@lotus.bostoncoop.net>
Reply-to: dpt@math.harvard.edu, 296087@bugs.debian.org

reopen 296087
severity 296087 minor
thanks

So if the Microsoft EULA doesn't apply to anything included in the
package, why is it included with the other licenses without any
indication that the corresponding components are not present in this
version?

Peace,
	Dylan

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Processed: So why is the EULA included?
  - From: owner@bugs.debian.org (Debian Bug Tracking System)
- Bug#296087: So why is the EULA included?
  - From: Rene Engelhard <rene@debian.org>

Prev by Date: Processed: So why is the EULA included?
Next by Date: Bug#296087: So why is the EULA included?
Previous by thread: Re: Bug#296335: openoffice.org: oocalc crashes while loading document on some computers
Next by thread: Processed: So why is the EULA included?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread