[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#278038: marked as done (Please add 'amd64' to the supported 'Architectures')

Your message dated Mon, 21 Nov 2005 11:18:05 +0100
with message-id <20051121101805.GC24198@rene-engelhard.de>
and subject line "fixed" due to removal of neon0.23
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 24 Oct 2004 12:31:16 +0000
>From aj@andaco.de Sun Oct 24 05:31:16 2004
Return-path: <aj@andaco.de>
Received: from c214235.adsl.hansenet.de (localhost.localdomain) [] 
	by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
	id 1CLhWl-0004wz-00; Sun, 24 Oct 2004 05:31:16 -0700
Received: from aj by localhost.localdomain with local (Exim 4.34)
	id 1CLhZ5-0004Ee-3s; Sun, 24 Oct 2004 14:33:39 +0200
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <submit@bugs.debian.org>
From: Andreas Jochens <aj@andaco.de>
Subject: neon0.23: FTBFS on amd64: Please add 'amd64' to the supported 'Architectures'
Message-Id: <E1CLhZ5-0004Ee-3s@localhost.localdomain>
Date: Sun, 24 Oct 2004 14:33:39 +0200
Delivered-To: submit@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 
	(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE 
	autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25

Package: neon0.23
Severity: wishlist
Tags: patch

Please add 'amd64' to the supported 'Architectures' in debian/control.

Andreas Jochens

diff -urN ../tmp-orig/neon0.23-0.23.9.dfsg.3/debian/control ./debian/control
--- ../tmp-orig/neon0.23-0.23.9.dfsg.3/debian/control	2004-10-24 12:16:43.730464152 +0000
+++ ./debian/control	2004-10-24 12:16:37.549403816 +0000
@@ -8,7 +8,7 @@
 Package: libneon23
 Section: oldlibs
-Architecture: i386 powerpc s390 sparc
+Architecture: amd64 i386 powerpc s390 sparc
 Depends: ${shlibs:Depends}
 Description: An HTTP and WebDAV client library [old version]
  neon is an HTTP and WebDAV client library, with a C language API.
@@ -41,7 +41,7 @@
 Package: libneon23-dev
 Section: libdevel
 Priority: extra
-Architecture: i386 powerpc sparc s390
+Architecture: amd64 i386 powerpc sparc s390
 Conflicts: libneon-dev
 Provides: libneon-dev
 Replaces: libneon-dev

Received: (at 278038-done) by bugs.debian.org; 21 Nov 2005 10:18:39 +0000
>From rene.engelhard@gmx.de Mon Nov 21 02:18:39 2005
Return-path: <rene.engelhard@gmx.de>
Received: from mail.gmx.net ([])
	by spohr.debian.org with smtp (Exim 4.50)
	id 1Ee8kw-0005Py-RB
	for 278038-done@bugs.debian.org; Mon, 21 Nov 2005 02:18:39 -0800
Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 21 Nov 2005 10:18:06 -0000
Received: from dslb-084-056-104-184.pools.arcor-ip.net (EHLO localhost) []
  by mail.gmx.net (mp036) with SMTP; 21 Nov 2005 11:18:06 +0100
X-Authenticated: #1545045
Received: by localhost (Postfix, from userid 1000)
	id A19B66A6B5; Mon, 21 Nov 2005 11:18:05 +0100 (CET)
Date: Mon, 21 Nov 2005 11:18:05 +0100
From: Rene Engelhard <rene@debian.org>
To: 307825-done@bugs.debian.org, 278038-done@bugs.debian.org
Subject: "fixed" due to removal of neon0.23
Message-ID: <20051121101805.GC24198@rene-engelhard.de>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
X-PGP-Key: 248AEB73
X-PGP-Fingerprint: 41FA F208 28D4 7CA5 19BB  7AD9 F859 90B0 248A EB73
Organization: The Debian Project
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i
X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
	(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no 


neon0.23 is onsolete in sid and now removed. Closing these bugs.



Reply to: