Bug#335392: openoffice.org: FTBFS on amd64: ** Error ** - Can't find file cws-ooo64bit02.2005-04-19-math-h.diff
[ quoting more than necessary for the buglogs sake. If you reply to bugs,
please do that to xxxx@bugs.debian.org, so it gets archived in the buglog.
That is then also send to -openoffice because -openoffice is the
Maintainer: ]
Am Sonntag, 30. Oktober 2005 14:56 schrieb Marc F. Clemente:
> I was able to build amd64 packages. I needed to make a few changes to
> the following file: openoffice.org-2.0.0/ooo-build/patches/OOO_2_0/apply
>
> There were two diff files which did not exist, and many more which were
> not included.
>
> One diff file (numberformat-sc.diff) had a hunk that did not work (so I
> removed that hunk).
>
> Also, I was unable to build with java, so I also disabled java in
> /debian/rules. I'm still looking it this.
>
> I include the changes I made. Maybe somebody can comment on them or
> give me feedback.
>
> I don't think amd64 is entirely stable and bug-free. After you
That's an understatement. It doesn't even play presentations.
See kendys talk about it at OOoCon:
http://ooocon-arnes.kiberpipa.org/media/index-talk.html
> successfuly build and install the packages, you will probably end up
> with something that crashes, or does not perform as it should. If you
> want something useful, try the 32bit version.
Indeed.
That's why amd64 is not enabled in the packages (and I talked with kendy about
making the ooo-build-2-0 branch buildable for am64 but we agreed it doesn't
make much sense; see above)
Regards,
Rene
--
.''`. René Engelhard -- Debian GNU/Linux Developer
: :' : http://www.debian.org | http://people.debian.org/~rene/
`. `' rene@debian.org | GnuPG-Key ID: 248AEB73
`- Fingerprint: 41FA F208 28D4 7CA5 19BB 7AD9 F859 90B0 248A EB73
Reply to: