Processed: retitle 322598 to langpacks should provide openoffice.org2-l10m-* instead of openoffice.org-l10n-*

To: rene.engelhard@gmx.de (Rene Engelhard)
Cc: Debian OpenOffice Team <debian-openoffice@lists.debian.org>(openoffice.org2 #322598)
Subject: Processed: retitle 322598 to langpacks should provide openoffice.org2-l10m-* instead of openoffice.org-l10n-*
From: owner@bugs.debian.org (Debian Bug Tracking System)
Date: Thu, 11 Aug 2005 13:03:09 -0700
Message-id: <[🔎] handler.s.C.112379012830822.transcript@bugs.debian.org>
In-reply-to: <20050811195448.AA8DB6A6E4@localhost>
References: <20050811195448.AA8DB6A6E4@localhost>

Processing commands for control@bugs.debian.org:

> retitle 322598 langpacks should provide openoffice.org2-l10m-* instead of openoffice.org-l10n-*
Bug#322598: langpacks hould provide openoffice.org2-l10n-* instead of openoffice.org-l10n-*
Changed Bug title.

>
End of message, stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

Reply to:

Prev by Date: Processed: Bug#322598: Should provide openoffice.org2-l10-* instead of openoffice.org-l10-*
Next by Date: Bug#198694: Why don't you compile OO with -O2 on i386?
Previous by thread: Bug#322598: marked as done (langpacks should provide openoffice.org2-l10m-* instead of openoffice.org-l10n-*)
Next by thread: Bug#198694: Why don't you compile OO with -O2 on i386?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread