Bug#316951: openoffice.org2: compile errors
Hi,
Am Dienstag, 5. Juli 2005 13:22 schrieb Brian May:
> I get the impression that the cause of problem #1 and #3 were due to
> my confusion in java-gcj-compat being split. I believe it was split in
#3 not. #3 is just that you changed to a compiler which didn't yet work with
the source. #1 is java-gcj-compat[-dev] problem and #2 is that patch.
After a second look, although the newest java-gcj-compat contains a libjawt.so
link it'd not help anyway since it doesn't look in i386/ for JDK == gcj.
> the Debian version of the package. I also believe that problem #2 was
I don't know whether it also split in Ubuntu. I just use Debian.
> Rene> It uses java-gcj-compats jni.h symlink. It should work on
> Rene> Debian but I did not test it anymnore with m108 since I
> Rene> already am at 114. And you need java-gcj-compat-dev in
> Rene> Build-Depends instead of only java-gcj-compat since
> Rene> java-gcj-compat was split.
>
> Ok, so it was meant to compile against gcc 3.4. This confused me
Yes.
> because the build depends have a lot of references to packages built
> >from gcc-4.0 source.
yeah, gcj/gij 4.0 and libcj6. Because that's what can build OOs Java stuff.
> If the symlink was in java-gcj-compats it didn't work, maybe the
> symlink was moved to java-gcj-compat-dev?
Yep.
> I apologise if I insulted you in anyway by providing too much
> information.
Well, in this case it was really clear what the error is, so... I other cases
you of course should give info, but in this trivial case... (at least for
someone who did the offending patch himself as gcj had libjawt..)
> Rene> You need forward declarations. Also already fixed.
>
> I guess I need to decide now if it is more productive fixing m108, the
> latest version in experimental or waiting for a new version to be
> released.
I'd wait. Why do you want to rebuild it anyway?
> I get the impression that version 108 in Debian experimental is old
> and obsolete. Is there another place I should be looking to get the
> most up-to-date package?
there's source for 1.9.110-0pre1 on p.d.o but I thik it will fail to build,
too. I am currently working on 1.9.114 which needs some finetuning still I
guess and then a i386 and powerpc (17 hrs!) build before I can upload it.
Regards,
Rene
--
.''`. René Engelhard -- Debian GNU/Linux Developer
: :' : http://www.debian.org | http://people.debian.org/~rene/
`. `' rene@debian.org | GnuPG-Key ID: 248AEB73
`- Fingerprint: 41FA F208 28D4 7CA5 19BB 7AD9 F859 90B0 248A EB73
Reply to: