[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#275106: marked as done (openoffice.org: Is it possible to get OpenOffice.org version 1.1.3 into Sarge?)



Your message dated Sun, 20 Mar 2005 14:02:06 +0100
with message-id <20050320130206.GA3170@rene-engelhard.de>
and subject line closing sarge-only bugs
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 5 Oct 2004 22:36:21 +0000
>From thatcher@truman.edu Tue Oct 05 15:36:21 2004
Return-path: <thatcher@truman.edu>
Received: from uranium.truman.edu [150.243.160.94] 
	by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
	id 1CExuv-0000yA-00; Tue, 05 Oct 2004 15:36:21 -0700
Received: from localhost ([150.243.64.87])
	by uranium.truman.edu (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i95MaKxu017704;
	Tue, 5 Oct 2004 17:36:20 -0500
	(envelope-from thatcher@truman.edu)
Received: from thatcher by localhost with local (Exim 4.34)
	id 1CExus-0001EU-VQ; Tue, 05 Oct 2004 17:36:19 -0500
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Scott Thatcher <thatcher@truman.edu>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <submit@bugs.debian.org>
Subject: openoffice.org: Is it possible to get OpenOffice.org version 1.1.3 into
 Sarge?
X-Mailer: reportbug 2.63
Date: Tue, 05 Oct 2004 17:36:18 -0500
Message-Id: <E1CExus-0001EU-VQ@localhost>
Sender: Scott Thatcher <thatcher@truman.edu>
X-PMX-Version: 4.7.0.111621, Antispam-Engine: 2.0.1.0, Antispam-Data: 2004.10.5.2
Delivered-To: submit@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 
	(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE 
	autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level: 

Package: openoffice.org
Version: 1.1.2-4
Severity: wishlist

Hello!  I'm writing with a question as to whether it's too late to get
OpenOffice 1.1.3 into Sarge.  The reason for my request is that 1.1.3 finally
fixes a bug that's very important to me---the lack of kerning for Type 1
fonts---that's affected versions of OpenOffice since at least 1.1.1.  This is
the type of bug that's meaningless to many people but very important to other
people.  For example, I just couldn't use OpenOffice for some projects for the
last year or so because of this bug.  I'd love it if I could use the official
Debian version of OpenOffice as part of Sarge and have this bug fixed.

Thanks for all your work with OpenOffice.org and Debian!

Scott Thatcher

-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
  APT prefers testing
  APT policy: (500, 'testing')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.8-1-686
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C

Versions of packages openoffice.org depends on:
ii  dictionaries-common [openo 0.22.40sarge3 Common utilities for spelling dict
ii  openoffice.org-bin         1.1.2-4       OpenOffice.org office suite binary
ii  openoffice.org-debian-file 1.1.2-4+1     Debian specific parts of OpenOffic
ii  openoffice.org-l10n-en [op 1.1.2-4       English (US) language package for 
ii  ttf-opensymbol             1.1.2-4       The OpenSymbol TrueType font

-- no debconf information

---------------------------------------
Received: (at 275106-done) by bugs.debian.org; 20 Mar 2005 13:02:53 +0000
>From rene.engelhard@gmx.de Sun Mar 20 05:02:53 2005
Return-path: <rene.engelhard@gmx.de>
Received: from mail.gmx.de (mail.gmx.net) [213.165.64.20] 
	by spohr.debian.org with smtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
	id 1DD04y-00006q-00; Sun, 20 Mar 2005 05:02:52 -0800
Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 20 Mar 2005 13:02:20 -0000
Received: from dsl-084-056-096-131.arcor-ip.net (EHLO localhost) [84.56.96.131]
  by mail.gmx.net (mp007) with SMTP; 20 Mar 2005 14:02:20 +0100
X-Authenticated: #1545045
Received: by localhost (Postfix, from userid 1000)
	id AFA051BFAC; Sun, 20 Mar 2005 14:02:06 +0100 (CET)
Date: Sun, 20 Mar 2005 14:02:06 +0100
From: Rene Engelhard <rene@debian.org>
To: 256826-done@bugs.debian.org, 288683-done@bugs.debian.org,
	275106-done@bugs.debian.org
Subject: closing sarge-only bugs
Message-ID: <20050320130206.GA3170@rene-engelhard.de>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
	protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="TB36FDmn/VVEgNH/"
Content-Disposition: inline
X-PGP-Key: 248AEB73
X-PGP-Fingerprint: 41FA F208 28D4 7CA5 19BB  7AD9 F859 90B0 248A EB73
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6+20040907i
X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0
Delivered-To: 275106-done@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
	(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no 
	version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level: 
X-CrossAssassin-Score: 2


--TB36FDmn/VVEgNH/
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Hi,

1.1.3-7 is now in testing (will enter the archive officially tonight
CET). Therefore Closing these sarge-only bugs.

Gr=FC=DFe/Regards,

Ren=E9
--=20
 .''`.  Ren=E9 Engelhard -- Debian GNU/Linux Developer
 : :' : http://www.debian.org | http://people.debian.org/~rene/
 `. `'  rene@debian.org | GnuPG-Key ID: 248AEB73
   `-   Fingerprint: 41FA F208 28D4 7CA5 19BB  7AD9 F859 90B0 248A EB73

--TB36FDmn/VVEgNH/
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: Digital signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFCPXRO+FmQsCSK63MRAseDAJ41ciyYuyIllSpLekltc8VlB8DwTACfc028
R/o7kXsZAeCVDZ7bNes4v9k=
=nW/E
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--TB36FDmn/VVEgNH/--



Reply to: