Bug#242414: openoffice.org: after clean install openoffice doesn't start anymore

[Chris Halls <halls@debian.org>]

tags 242414 + moreinfo
tags 242414 + unreproducible
thanks

On Tue, 2004-04-06 at 17:49, Florian Reitmeir wrote:
> after that, i started it like in den README mentioned 
> 	rm ~/.sversionrc ; rm -r ~/.openoffice ; openoffice
> 
> and got a crash like:
> ------------------------- CUT -----------------------------
> OpenOffice.org for Debian - see
> /usr/share/doc/openoffice.org/README.Debian.gz
> running openoffice.org setup...
> /usr/lib/openoffice/program/setup.bin: relocation error:
> /usr/lib/openoffice/program/libtk645li.so: undefined symbol:

There should be the name of the missing symbol there.

> setup failed.. abort

> ------------------------- CUT -----------------------------
> 
> an 'ldd /usr/lib/openoffice/program/libtk645li.so' show something like:
> 				libvcl645li.so => not found
>         libsot645li.so => not found
>         libutl645li.so => not found
>         libtl645li.so => not found
>         libcomphelp3gcc3.so => not found
>         libcppuhelpergcc3.so.3 => not found
>         libcppu.so.3 => not found
>         libsal.so.3 => not found

This is normal.  You have to tell ldd to include
/usr/lib/openoffice/program in its search path, like the wrapper scripts
do.

chris@feathers:~$ LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/usr/lib/openoffice/program ldd
/usr/lib/openoffice/program/libtk645li.so
        libvcl645li.so => /usr/lib/openoffice/program/libvcl645li.so (0x4229c000)
        libsot645li.so => /usr/lib/openoffice/program/libsot645li.so (0x4270f000)
        libutl645li.so => /usr/lib/openoffice/program/libutl645li.so (0x41973000)
        libtl645li.so => /usr/lib/openoffice/program/libtl645li.so (0x417ea000)
etc.

Does ldd now produce reasonable output?

Does 'debsums -s openoffice.org-bin' report any checksum mismatches?

Chris