[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#235763: marked as done (openoffice.org: crash starting soffice.bin)



Your message dated Thu, 18 Mar 2004 15:00:33 +0100
with message-id <20040318140033.GB1100@rene-engelhard.de>
and subject line looks like it was a general system problem
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 2 Mar 2004 10:00:43 +0000
>From jim@amarooas.com.au Tue Mar 02 02:00:43 2004
Return-path: <jim@amarooas.com.au>
Received: from mail.canberrawines.com.au (mailhost.netspeed.com.au) [203.31.48.33] 
	by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
	id 1Ay6hf-0003j9-00; Tue, 02 Mar 2004 02:00:43 -0800
Received: from sun (unverified [203.22.237.63]) 
	by mailhost.netspeed.com.au (SurgeMail 1.6e2) with ESMTP id 21153596 
	for <submit@bugs.debian.org>; Tue, 02 Mar 2004 21:03:27 +1100
Received: from jim by sun with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian))
	id 1Ay6hb-0004Cs-00; Tue, 02 Mar 2004 21:00:39 +1100
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Jim Watson <jim@amarooas.com.au>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <submit@bugs.debian.org>
Subject: openoffice.org: crash starting soffice.bin
X-Mailer: reportbug 2.48
Date: Tue, 02 Mar 2004 21:00:39 +1100
Message-Id: <[🔎] E1Ay6hb-0004Cs-00@sun>
X-Server: High Performance Mail Server - http://surgemail.com
Delivered-To: submit@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_01 
	(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.0 required=4.0 tests=HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no 
	version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_01
X-Spam-Level: 

Package: openoffice.org
Version: 1.1.0-6
Severity: grave
Tags: sid
Justification: renders package unusable



-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: sparc (sparc64)
Kernel: Linux 2.4.18
Locale: LANG=en_US, LC_CTYPE=en_US

Versions of packages openoffice.org depends on:
ii  debianutils                   2.6.2      Miscellaneous utilities specific t
ii  dictionaries-common           0.20.1     Common utilities for spelling dict
ii  openoffice.org-bin            1.1.0-6    OpenOffice.org office suite binary
ii  openoffice.org-debian-files   1.1.0-6+2  Debian specific parts of OpenOffic
ii  openoffice.org-l10n-en [openo 1.1.0-6    English (US) language package for 

-- no debconf information
I run gdb soffice.bin
ead 16384 (LWP 15822)]

Breakpoint 1, 0x7178333c in
cppu::OWeakAggObject::queryAggregation(com::sun::star::uno::Type const&) ()
from ./libcppuhelpergcc3.so.3
(gdb) next
Single stepping until exit from function
_ZN4cppu14OWeakAggObject16queryAggregationERKN3com3sun4star3uno4TypeE, 
which has no line number information.

Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault.
0x717c6a80 in typelib_typedescriptionreference_equals () from ./libcppu.so.3
(gdb) where
#0  0x717c6a80 in typelib_typedescriptionreference_equals ()
   from ./libcppu.so.3
#1  0x71784dcc in com::sun::star::uno::Any
cppu::queryInterface<com::sun::star::uno::XInterface,
com::sun::star::uno::XAggregation,
com::sun::star::uno::XWeak>(com::sun::star::uno::Type const&,
com::sun::star::uno::XInterface*, com::sun::star::uno::XAggregation*,
com::sun::star::uno::XWeak*) ()
   from ./libcppuhelpergcc3.so.3
#2  0x71783360 in
cppu::OWeakAggObject::queryAggregation(com::sun::star::uno::Type const&) ()
from ./libcppuhelpergcc3.so.3
(gdb) 


---------------------------------------
Received: (at 235763-done) by bugs.debian.org; 18 Mar 2004 14:03:17 +0000
>From rene@rene-engelhard.de Thu Mar 18 06:03:17 2004
Return-path: <rene@rene-engelhard.de>
Received: from port-212-202-209-234.reverse.qsc.de (stan.ping.de) [212.202.209.234] 
	by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
	id 1B3y7B-0006xj-00; Thu, 18 Mar 2004 06:03:17 -0800
Received: from rene by stan.ping.de with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian))
	id 1B3y7A-00055Q-00
	for <235763-done@bugs.debian.org>; Thu, 18 Mar 2004 15:03:16 +0100
X-IMAP-Sender: rene
Date: Thu, 18 Mar 2004 15:00:33 +0100
X-OfflineIMAP-29106033-52656d6f7465-494e424f582e4f7574626f78: 1079618578-0445801637674
From: Rene Engelhard <rene@debian.org>
To: 235763-done@bugs.debian.org
Subject: looks like it was a general system problem
Message-ID: <20040318140033.GB1100@rene-engelhard.de>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1; x-action=pgp-signed
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Operating-System: Debian GNU/Linux
X-PGP-Key: 248AEB73
X-PGP-Fingerprint: 41FA F208 28D4 7CA5 19BB  7AD9 F859 90B0 248A EB73
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.5.1+cvs20040105i
Sender: Rene Engelhard <rene@rene-engelhard.de>
Delivered-To: 235763-done@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_12 
	(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.1 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,UPPERCASE_25_50 
	autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_12
X-Spam-Level: 

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Hi,

submitter writes that this was probably a general system problem and
it now works.

Closing.

Grüße/Regards,

René
- -- 
 .''`.  René Engelhard -- Debian GNU/Linux Developer
 : :' : http://www.debian.org | http://people.debian.org/~rene/
 `. `'  rene@debian.org | GnuPG-Key ID: 248AEB73
   `-   Fingerprint: 41FA F208 28D4 7CA5 19BB  7AD9 F859 90B0 248A EB73
      
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFAWauB+FmQsCSK63MRAgJDAJ48/YmhLrTiXcoWrhcJltWWhBX34wCfRXPu
Wcs9/CM8BV/ixNMrTaSwvIw=
=QXy/
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----



Reply to: