CVS:oo-deb/debian changelog,1.236,1.237
Update of /cvs/debian-openoffice/oo-deb/debian
In directory gluck:/tmp/cvs-serv17383
Modified Files:
changelog
Log Message:
* Mention gui-scale-ruler.diff
* Change wording of font patch descriptions to remove the wording about
back to original OOo settings, since we are not going back for broken
displays (those with incorrect DPI < 96)
Index: changelog
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/debian-openoffice/oo-deb/debian/changelog,v
retrieving revision 1.236
retrieving revision 1.237
diff -u -d -r1.236 -r1.237
--- changelog 13 Nov 2003 17:19:35 -0000 1.236
+++ changelog 14 Nov 2003 10:26:22 -0000 1.237
@@ -14,15 +14,16 @@
+ gnome-desktop-force: Introduce a new envvar, OOO_FORCE_DESKTOP that
can be set to 'gnome', 'kde' or 'none' to override OOo's desktop
detection [MM, PL, CH]
+ + gui-scale-ruler.diff: Reduce the font size of the toolbar font slightly
+ so the ruler is not so cluttered [MM]
* Modified patches:
+ setup-in-bind-mount: Use official fix from IZ#20459 using
realpath(); also return non-zero exit code on failure. [CH]
+ layout-vcl-window: Fix reverse size calculation [CH]
+ gui-font-scale: Window::ImplPointToLogic has a reverse
- (ImplLogicToPoint) which was not modified, fixed. This should
- hopefully fix the original 'Menu fonts too small' bugs [CH]
- + gui-font-default-size: Reduce the default menu font size to the
- same size as the original OOo (closes: #218585) [CH]
+ (ImplLogicToPoint) which was not modified, fixed. [CH]
+ + gui-font-default-size: Reduce the default menu font size back again
+ (closes: #218585) [CH]
+ gui-fonts-kde: [CH]
- Respect the 'use system UI fonts' setting instead of always
assuming the user wants it.
@@ -77,7 +78,7 @@
is compatible with other backports that need a newer
libfreetype (X 4.3, Gnome 2 etc.) [CH]
- -- Chris Halls <halls@debian.org> Thu, 13 Nov 2003 18:17:31 +0100
+ -- Chris Halls <halls@debian.org> Fri, 14 Nov 2003 10:53:19 +0100
openoffice.org (1.1.0-2) unstable; urgency=low
Reply to: