Bug#174490: marked as done (openoffice.org-debian-files: no spadmin file and spadmin.bin doesn't save the printer settings)
Your message dated Sat, 22 Feb 2003 02:17:51 +0100
with message-id <20030222011751.GA11180@rene-engelhard.de>
and subject line Bug#174490: openoffice.org-debian-files: no spadmin file and spadmin.bin doesn't save the printer settings
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 27 Dec 2002 19:49:13 +0000
>From toma@mlf.linux.rulez.org Fri Dec 27 13:49:13 2002
Return-path: <toma@mlf.linux.rulez.org>
Received: from mlf.linux.rulez.org [192.188.244.13]
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 18S0To-00062X-00; Fri, 27 Dec 2002 13:49:13 -0600
Received: by mlf.linux.rulez.org (Postfix, from userid 1015)
id F315A8B972; Fri, 27 Dec 2002 20:49:10 +0100 (CET)
From: Szerb Tamas <toma@mlf.linux.rulez.org>
Subject: openoffice.org-debian-files: no spadmin file and spadmin.bin doesn't save the printer settings
To: submit@bugs.debian.org
X-Mailer: bug 3.3.10
Message-Id: <20021227194910.F315A8B972@mlf.linux.rulez.org>
Date: Fri, 27 Dec 2002 20:49:10 +0100 (CET)
Delivered-To: submit@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.6 required=5.0
tests=SPAM_PHRASE_00_01
version=2.41
X-Spam-Level:
Package: openoffice.org-debian-files
Version: N/A
Severity: normal
the oopadmin calls the spadim file which isn't existing (not like the
spadmin.bin) and after configuring the printers it does't save the config,
so restarting it - it shows there is no printer configured yet. So i'm
unable to print with oowrite because there is no saved configured printer.
-- System Information
Debian Release: testing/unstable
Kernel Version: Linux mlf 2.4.18 #1 Tue Jun 25 14:55:24 CEST 2002 i586 unknown
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 174490-done) by bugs.debian.org; 22 Feb 2003 01:18:36 +0000
>From rene@debian.org Fri Feb 21 19:18:35 2003
Return-path: <rene@debian.org>
Received: from ping-ef-gw.ping.de (noefs.ping.de) [62.72.90.14] (mail)
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 18mOJG-0003fE-00; Fri, 21 Feb 2003 19:18:35 -0600
Received: from [10.11.11.81] (helo=stan.ping.de)
by noefs.ping.de with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian))
id 18mOJF-0006cm-00
for <174490-done@bugs.debian.org>; Sat, 22 Feb 2003 02:18:33 +0100
Received: by stan.ping.de (Postfix, from userid 1000)
id CB5AA77502; Sat, 22 Feb 2003 02:17:51 +0100 (CET)
Date: Sat, 22 Feb 2003 02:17:51 +0100
From: Rene Engelhard <rene@debian.org>
To: 174490-done@bugs.debian.org
Subject: Re: Bug#174490: openoffice.org-debian-files: no spadmin file and spadmin.bin doesn't save the printer settings
Message-ID: <20030222011751.GA11180@rene-engelhard.de>
References: <[🔎] 20030221101703.GG22932@shawn.gmx.de> <[🔎] Pine.LNX.4.21.0302211706050.23805-100000@mlf.linux.rulez.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="y0ulUmNC+osPPQO6"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <[🔎] Pine.LNX.4.21.0302211706050.23805-100000@mlf.linux.rulez.org>
X-Operating-System: Debian GNU/Linux
X-GnuPG-Key: $ finger rene@db.debian.org
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.3i
Delivered-To: 174490-done@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.7 required=4.0
tests=IN_REP_TO,PGP_SIGNATURE_2,QUOTED_EMAIL_TEXT,REFERENCES,
SPAM_PHRASE_00_01,USER_AGENT,USER_AGENT_MUTT
version=2.44
X-Spam-Level:
--y0ulUmNC+osPPQO6
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Tamas SZERB wrote:
> Seems my old machine is totally buggy, it works now in the other, brand
> new installed debian unstable. Thanks the information, you can close the
> bug.
Closing as requested.
Regards,
Rene
--=20
.''`. Rene Engelhard -- Debian GNU/Linux Developer
: :' : http://www.debian.org | http://people.debian.org/~rene/
`. `' rene@debian.org | GnuPG-Key ID: 248AEB73
`- Fingerprint: 41FA F208 28D4 7CA5 19BB 7AD9 F859 90B0 248A EB73
--y0ulUmNC+osPPQO6
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQE+Vs+/+FmQsCSK63MRApv3AJ4unoU894NYeqP1PkgcnxE1XQULxgCcDd/R
m3Tj9GDBuLYxC+G8G1hGSPA=
=acRC
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--y0ulUmNC+osPPQO6--
Reply to: