[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#218585: Openoffice UI fonts now way too big



Package: openoffice.org
Version: 1.1.0-2
Severity: minor

You're going to hate me for this...  :-)

After installing the new version of Openoffice which, according the
changelog, defaults to a 12pt font size, the interface text is now way
too big.  (A rough comparison with other text in OOo suggests it is now
~18pt.  The fonts with 1.1.0-1 were perhaps a little on the small side
but by no means unreadable.)  Under KDE the interface font looks fine,
presumably at the 12pt size that you claim in the changelog.

http://cp.yi.org/cameron/ooo_fonts1.png (with 1.1.0-2)
http://cp.yi.org/cameron/ooo_fonts2.png (with 1.1.0-1)
http://cp.yi.org/cameron/ooo_fonts3.png (with 1.1.0-2 under KDE)

Some bits of information which perusing bug #207957 suggests may be
useful:

- I'm not using KDE or Gnome
- X server is started with KDM, given -dpi 96 on the command line
- Xft.dpi is not set according to xrdb -query; setting it to 96 doesn't
  appear to alter anything
- Fiddling with "Use system font" doesn't affect anything
- Running under KDE it looks much nicer, obeying the KDE defaults for
  font size and colours; even when "Use system font" is turned off it
  defaults to a much smaller font than it does without KDE running.
- The preferences dialog doesn't even fit on the screen at 1152x864
  resolution...

Cheers,

Cameron.

-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
Architecture: i386
Kernel: Linux erdos 2.4.21-cjp-erdos-3 #1 Sun Aug 24 01:18:50 WST 2003 i686
Locale: LANG=en_AU.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_AU.UTF-8

Versions of packages openoffice.org depends on:
ii  dictionaries-common           0.15.7     Common utilities for spelling dict
ii  openoffice.org-bin            1.1.0-2    OpenOffice.org office suite binary
ii  openoffice.org-debian-files   1.1.0-2+1  Debian specific parts of OpenOffic
ii  openoffice.org-l10n-en [openo 1.1.0-2    English US language package for op

-- no debconf information





Reply to: