Bug#214915: marked as done (KDE file associations lost after upgrade to 1.1.0)
Your message dated Thu, 9 Oct 2003 17:40:08 +0200
with message-id <20031009154008.GA25078@rene-engelhard.de>
and subject line Bug#214915: KDE file associations lost after upgrade to 1.1.0
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 9 Oct 2003 10:59:58 +0000
>From magnus@vonkoeller.de Thu Oct 09 05:55:17 2003
Return-path: <magnus@vonkoeller.de>
Received: from dd2004.kasserver.com [81.209.148.121]
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1A7YRw-0003lQ-00; Thu, 09 Oct 2003 05:55:16 -0500
Received: from 172.16.13.17 (1a0dc.unt0.etta.i-u.de [217.7.26.13])
by dd2004.kasserver.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9AB478F11D
for <submit@bugs.debian.org>; Thu, 9 Oct 2003 12:54:32 +0200 (CEST)
From: Magnus von Koeller <magnus@vonkoeller.de>
To: submit@bugs.debian.org
Subject: KDE file associations lost after upgrade to 1.1.0
Date: Thu, 9 Oct 2003 12:54:31 +0200
User-Agent: KMail/1.5.3
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
Message-Id: <[🔎] 200310091254.31701@vonkoeller.de>
Delivered-To: submit@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.5 required=4.0
tests=BAYES_01,HAS_PACKAGE
version=2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_10_09
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_10_09 (1.174.2.15-2003-03-30-exp)
Package: openoffice.org
Version: 1.1.0-1
Since upgrading to openoffice.org, the KDE file associations with the
extensions *.sxw *.sxc and I figure also the other OpenOffice
extensions are lost. I had to re-add them manually.
The associations are not set to the wrong program, they are simply
completely lost.
Linux epiphyte 2.4.22-ac2 #2 Sun Oct 5 20:24:08 CEST 2003 i686
GNU/Linux
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 214915-done) by bugs.debian.org; 9 Oct 2003 15:41:44 +0000
>From rene@rene-engelhard.de Thu Oct 09 10:41:43 2003
Return-path: <rene@rene-engelhard.de>
Received: from stan.ping.de [62.72.95.4]
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1A7cv9-00018m-00; Thu, 09 Oct 2003 10:41:43 -0500
Received: from rene by stan.ping.de with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian))
id 1A7cv6-0004WD-00
for <214915-done@bugs.debian.org>; Thu, 09 Oct 2003 17:41:40 +0200
X-IMAP-Sender: rene
Date: Thu, 9 Oct 2003 17:40:08 +0200
X-OfflineIMAP-x1470999924-52656d6f7465-494e424f582e4f7574626f78: 1065714021-0636362652331
From: Rene Engelhard <rene@debian.org>
To: 214915-done@bugs.debian.org
Subject: Re: Bug#214915: KDE file associations lost after upgrade to 1.1.0
Message-ID: <20031009154008.GA25078@rene-engelhard.de>
References: <[🔎] 200310091254.31701@vonkoeller.de> <[🔎] 20031009120126.GA9287@rene-engelhard.de> <[🔎] 200310091512.47836@vonkoeller.de>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="k+w/mQv8wyuph6w0"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <[🔎] 200310091512.47836@vonkoeller.de>
X-Operating-System: Debian GNU/Linux
X-GnuPG-Key: $ finger rene@db.debian.org
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.4i
Sender: Rene Engelhard <rene@rene-engelhard.de>
Delivered-To: 214915-done@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.7 required=4.0
tests=BAYES_30,EMAIL_ATTRIBUTION,QUOTED_EMAIL_TEXT
version=2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_10_09
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_10_09 (1.174.2.15-2003-03-30-exp)
--k+w/mQv8wyuph6w0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Hi,
Magnus von Koeller wrote:
> > openoffice.org-mimelnk installed?
>=20
> Nope, that was it. Shouldn't this be pulled in automatically or=20
> something?
It already is Recommended....
The Debian policy manual says:
Recommends
This declares a strong, but not absolute, dependency.
The Recommends field should list packages that would be found
together with this one in all but unusual installations.=20
OpenOffice.org doesn't _need_ it, so...
Closing this bug.
Gr=FC=DFe/Regards,
Ren=E9
--=20
.''`. Ren=E9 Engelhard -- Debian GNU/Linux Developer
: :' : http://www.debian.org | http://people.debian.org/~rene/
`. `' rene@debian.org | GnuPG-Key ID: 248AEB73
`- Fingerprint: 41FA F208 28D4 7CA5 19BB 7AD9 F859 90B0 248A EB73
=20
--k+w/mQv8wyuph6w0
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: Digital signature
Content-Disposition: inline
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQE/hYFX+FmQsCSK63MRAk2AAJ9t84e6VgQwDeVKwIxn0mUUr5hZrQCeK8c7
WtKipIhm48Bb9nhp+CuKrSc=
=jRdn
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--k+w/mQv8wyuph6w0--
Reply to: