[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#175133: marked as done (openoffice.org: bad window behavior)



Your message dated Wed, 8 Oct 2003 18:09:58 +0200
with message-id <20031008160958.GB32363@shawn.thehalls.de>
and subject line Bug#175133: openoffice.org: bad window behavior
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 3 Jan 2003 04:49:03 +0000
>From dman@dman.ddts.net Thu Jan 02 22:49:03 2003
Return-path: <dman@dman.ddts.net>
Received: from 65-37-45-154.nrp4.roc.ny.frontiernet.net (dman.ddts.net) [65.37.45.154] 
	by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
	id 18UJlW-0002q7-00; Thu, 02 Jan 2003 22:49:03 -0600
Received: from dman by dman.ddts.net (Exim 4.05 #8 (Debian))
    	protocol: local
	id 18UJlT-0001yd-00; Thu, 02 Jan 2003 23:48:59 -0500
From: dman <dman@dman.ddts.net>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <submit@bugs.debian.org>
Subject: openoffice.org: bad window behavior
X-Mailer: reportbug 1.50
Date: Thu, 02 Jan 2003 23:48:59 -0500
Message-Id: <E18UJlT-0001yd-00@dman.ddts.net>
Delivered-To: submit@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.6 required=5.0
	tests=SPAM_PHRASE_00_01
	version=2.41
X-Spam-Level: 

Package: openoffice.org
Version: 1.0.1-7
Severity: normal

OOo places itself on top of other windows when the mouse passes over
it.  It seems to only do that when a modal dialog is open.  No
application should _ever_ shove itself to the top.  Only the window
manager should make such changes to windows.


-- System Information
Debian Release: testing/unstable
Architecture: i386
Kernel: Linux dman 2.4.19-custom.4 #1 Tue Dec 3 00:15:51 EST 2002 i686
Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8

Versions of packages openoffice.org depends on:
ii  openoffice.org-bin            1.0.1-7    OpenOffice.org office suite binary
ii  openoffice.org-debian-files   1.0.1-6+3  Debian specific parts of OpenOffic
ii  openoffice.org-l10n-en        1.0.1-7    English (US) language package for 


---------------------------------------
Received: (at 175133-close) by bugs.debian.org; 8 Oct 2003 16:10:57 +0000
>From halls@debian.org Wed Oct 08 11:10:01 2003
Return-path: <halls@debian.org>
Received: from (rover24.cmt) [62.138.132.197] 
	by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
	id 1A7Gsy-0008Vr-00; Wed, 08 Oct 2003 11:10:01 -0500
Received: from shawn (unknown [192.168.60.57])
	by rover24.cmt (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6EE96C79F3
	for <175133-close@bugs.debian.org>; Wed,  8 Oct 2003 18:10:00 +0200 (CEST)
Received: by shawn (Postfix, from userid 1050)
	id 65FB3DB2; Wed,  8 Oct 2003 18:09:58 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Wed, 8 Oct 2003 18:09:58 +0200
From: Chris Halls <halls@debian.org>
To: 175133-close@bugs.debian.org
Subject: Re: Bug#175133: openoffice.org: bad window behavior
Message-ID: <20031008160958.GB32363@shawn.thehalls.de>
References: <20030106103019.GC25841@shawn.gmx.de> <[🔎] 20031008101926.GI7912@shawn.thehalls.de> <[🔎] 20031008154517.GA2447@dman13.dyndns.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <[🔎] 20031008154517.GA2447@dman13.dyndns.org>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.4i
Delivered-To: 175133-close@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.5 required=4.0
	tests=EMAIL_ATTRIBUTION
	version=2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_10_05
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_10_05 (1.174.2.15-2003-03-30-exp)

On Wed, Oct 08, 2003 at 11:45:17AM -0400, Derrick 'dman' Hudson wrote:
> Yea!  I could not reproduce this behavior just now :-).

Horray!  Thanks a lot,
Chris



Reply to: