Le ven 22/08/2003 à 23:15, Rene Engelhard a écrit : > Hi, > > Jan-Hendrik Palic wrote: > > On Fri, Aug 22, 2003 at 09:54:02PM +0200, Jérôme Warnier wrote: > > >Yet another problem. The log is attached. > > >It seems it tries to use the internal Mozilla libs but they are build > > >with gcc 3.2 or 3.3 (libstdc++5) while Woody is using 3.0 (libstdc++3). > > > > What arch are you using? On PPC, the mozdeps are build with gcc-3.2 (I > > i386 I suppose. You're right. > > think), but Rene rebuild them with gcc-3.2 for I386, too. > > There were efforts for doing that yes, and this could be done > any time we want it. Has anyone already tried to benchmark the difference of performance between OOo build with GCC 3.0 and GCC 3.2. > But I _didn't_ touch the mozzips here; they are linked to > libstdc++5 _upstream_ now, what a ldd on e.g. libxpcom.so > obtained from the i386 mozzips in the source reveals.. > > > This would be a problem for backporting OOo on Woody anyway. > > Jup. > > AFAIS we have two possibilities for woody: > > 1) remove mozilla And Mozilla Addressbook functionality? I don't care about Mozilla, but does it have any other effect than disabling the data source? > 2) do the steps the other way round and have to patch debian/rules > to copy hand-built mozzips (libstc++3) into the place... Isn't there possible to use the system Mozilla? > Grüße/Regards, > > René -- Jérôme Warnier <jwarnier@beeznest.net>
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Ceci est une partie de message =?ISO-8859-1?Q?num=E9riquement?= =?ISO-8859-1?Q?_sign=E9e?=