Hi, [ changing the subject... ] Jérôme Warnier wrote: > Ah? > And why > http://lists.debian.org/debian-openoffice/2003/debian-openoffice-200307/msg00171.html, then? Because of exactly the reason I wrote already. :P Chris writes in that message: > --- officecfg/registry/data/org/openoffice/Office/Common.xcu 8 Apr > 2003 15:55:00 -0000 1.10 > +++ officecfg/registry/data/org/openoffice/Office/Common.xcu 20 May > 2003 10:54:34 -0000 > > to this: > >--- openoffice/officecfg/registry/data/org/openoffice/Office/Common.xcu >8 Apr 2003 15:55:00 -0000 1.10 >+++ openoffice/officecfg/registry/data/org/openoffice/Office/Common.xcu >20 May 2003 10:54:34 -0000 If you would do the "first variant patch", it would strip of officecfg and does not find the file. On the second one openoffice is stripped, officecfg/* remains and can be found for patching debisn/scripts/patch.apply contains: | if $cmd $parms $f | (cd $SOURCE_TREE; patch -p1) > $stampfile.log; then So the patches are applied when you are alread in $SOURCE_TREE (build_tree/oo_1.1_rc in his case) and you of course need that officecfg/ to figure out which file to patch.... Grüße/Regards, René -- .''`. René Engelhard -- Debian GNU/Linux Developer : :' : http://www.debian.org | http://people.debian.org/~rene/ `. `' rene@debian.org | GnuPG-Key ID: 248AEB73 `- Fingerprint: 41FA F208 28D4 7CA5 19BB 7AD9 F859 90B0 248A EB73
Attachment:
pgpQgnnDc_pOm.pgp
Description: PGP signature