Bug#201742: marked as done (openoffice.org-spellcheck-de-at: file /usr/lib/openoffice/share/dict/ooo/de_AT.aff seems to be missing.)
Your message dated Thu, 17 Jul 2003 17:53:12 +0200
with message-id <20030717155312.GA27285@rene-engelhard.de>
and subject line Bug#201742: openoffice.org-spellcheck-de-at: file /usr/lib/openoffice/share/dict/ooo/de_AT.aff seems to be missing.
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 17 Jul 2003 15:00:32 +0000
>From willi@jordy.home.net Thu Jul 17 10:00:06 2003
Return-path: <willi@jordy.home.net>
Received: from ns1.a5web.de [64.65.0.7]
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 19dAEn-0002Bu-00; Thu, 17 Jul 2003 10:00:05 -0500
Received: from jordy.home.net (xdsl-213-196-240-175.netcologne.de [213.196.240.175])
by ns1.a5web.de (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id RAA20820;
Thu, 17 Jul 2003 17:10:30 +0200
Received: by jordy.home.net (Postfix, from userid 1000)
id 42EBF5FA49; Thu, 17 Jul 2003 16:56:54 +0200 (CEST)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Wilfried Goesgens <willi@goesgens.de>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <submit@bugs.debian.org>
Subject: openoffice.org-spellcheck-de-at: file
/usr/lib/openoffice/share/dict/ooo/de_AT.aff seems to be missing.
X-Mailer: reportbug 2.10.1
Date: Thu, 17 Jul 2003 16:56:54 +0200
Message-Id: <[🔎] 20030717145654.42EBF5FA49@jordy.home.net>
Delivered-To: submit@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0
tests=BAYES_10,HAS_PACKAGE
version=2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_06_27
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_06_27 (1.174.2.15-2003-03-30-exp)
Package: openoffice.org-spellcheck-de-at
Version: 20020701-6
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
I had problems using other dictionaries than the english one in
openoffice. I installed the de_DE one, nothing changed. to check again,
i installed the Austrian and swizz ones, nothing. asked in
#openoffice.org, they told me to use
http://ooo.ximian.com/install-dict.in
I changed the toplevel directory, which is to be automaticaly replaced
with @@'s arround it. started it, it nodded, the file was missing.
copied the one from the swiss book to it, ran the script again, now it works.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
Architecture: i386
Kernel: Linux jordy.home.net 2.4.21 #3 Sat Jul 12 05:27:52 CEST 2003 i686
Locale: LANG=de_DE, LC_CTYPE=de_DE
Versions of packages openoffice.org-spellcheck-de-at depends on:
ii openoffice.org 1.0.3-2 high-quality office productivity s
ii openoffice.org-spellcheck-de- 20020701-6 German spellchecking for OpenOffic
-- no debconf information
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 201742-done) by bugs.debian.org; 17 Jul 2003 15:54:57 +0000
>From rene@rene-engelhard.de Thu Jul 17 10:54:53 2003
Return-path: <rene@rene-engelhard.de>
Received: from moutvdom.kundenserver.de [212.227.126.250]
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 19dB5o-0000ph-00; Thu, 17 Jul 2003 10:54:52 -0500
Received: from [212.227.126.220] (helo=mrvdomng.kundenserver.de)
by moutvdom.kundenserver.de with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1)
id 19dB5o-0005sI-00; Thu, 17 Jul 2003 17:54:52 +0200
Received: from [129.240.72.26] (helo=frodo)
by mrvdomng.kundenserver.de with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1)
id 19dB5o-0002cL-00; Thu, 17 Jul 2003 17:54:52 +0200
Received: by frodo (Postfix, from userid 1000)
id 0B88913E22; Thu, 17 Jul 2003 17:53:13 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Thu, 17 Jul 2003 17:53:12 +0200
From: Rene Engelhard <rene@debian.org>
To: Wilfried Goesgens <willi@goesgens.de>,
201742-done@bugs.debian.org
Subject: Re: Bug#201742: openoffice.org-spellcheck-de-at: file /usr/lib/openoffice/share/dict/ooo/de_AT.aff seems to be missing.
Message-ID: <20030717155312.GA27285@rene-engelhard.de>
References: <[🔎] 20030717145654.42EBF5FA49@jordy.home.net>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="T4sUOijqQbZv57TR"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <[🔎] 20030717145654.42EBF5FA49@jordy.home.net>
X-Operating-System: Debian GNU/Linux
X-GnuPG-Key: $ finger rene@db.debian.org
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.4i
Delivered-To: 201742-done@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-21.8 required=4.0
tests=BAYES_01,EMAIL_ATTRIBUTION,IN_REP_TO,PGP_SIGNATURE_2,
QUOTED_EMAIL_TEXT,REFERENCES,REPLY_WITH_QUOTES,
USER_AGENT_MUTT
autolearn=ham version=2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_06_27
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_06_27 (1.174.2.15-2003-03-30-exp)
--T4sUOijqQbZv57TR
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Hi,
Wilfried Goesgens wrote:
> Package: openoffice.org-spellcheck-de-at
> Version: 20020701-6
> Severity: grave
> Justification: renders package unusable
bwahaha...
> I had problems using other dictionaries than the english one in
> openoffice. I installed the de_DE one, nothing changed. to check again,
> i installed the Austrian and swizz ones, nothing. asked in
You know that you need to enable the german spellcheck in OOo's options
after installing the packages manually?
> #openoffice.org, they told me to use
> http://ooo.ximian.com/install-dict.in
ah, you were the person...
It seems to me that this script does that already for you..
> I changed the toplevel directory, which is to be automaticaly replaced
> with @@'s arround it. started it, it nodded, the file was missing.
You do not need de_AT.aff in our package structure.
-de-at depends on -de-at.
the standard entries for dictionary.lst for -de-at are:
de AT de_AT
de DE de_DE
which means that we use the .dic from -de-at and the de_DE.aff (they are
identical anyway so it would be waste to provide them two times under
different names).
You shouldn't use tools not knowing what the structures of our packages
are...
Gr=FC=DFe/Regards,
Ren=E9
--=20
.''`. Ren=E9 Engelhard -- Debian GNU/Linux Developer
: :' : http://www.debian.org | http://people.debian.org/~rene/
`. `' rene@debian.org | GnuPG-Key ID: 248AEB73
`- Fingerprint: 41FA F208 28D4 7CA5 19BB 7AD9 F859 90B0 248A EB73
=20
--T4sUOijqQbZv57TR
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.2 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQE/FsZo+FmQsCSK63MRAqfbAJ9jdrwKU5i5LXKNt8peOnrgalqnigCfZYN0
vkWgfTHHleESHi5LXU4NFi8=
=WDc6
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--T4sUOijqQbZv57TR--
Reply to: