[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#194898: marked as done (openoffice.org: bad date interpretation (today's date))



Your message dated Tue, 10 Jun 2003 10:37:45 +0200
with message-id <20030610083745.GA19356@shawn.thehalls.de>
and subject line Bug#194898: closing as requested by submitter
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 27 May 2003 13:20:37 +0000
>From iranzo@merak.no-ip.org Tue May 27 08:07:15 2003
Return-path: <iranzo@merak.no-ip.org>
Received: from 81-202-116-32.user.ono.com (Merak.no-ip.org) [81.202.116.32] 
	by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
	id 19KeAc-0000AT-00; Tue, 27 May 2003 08:07:14 -0500
Received: from deneb ([1.1.1.2] helo=Deneb.Alufis)
	by Merak.no-ip.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian))
	id 19Kdv9-0000x5-00
	for <submit@bugs.debian.org>; Tue, 27 May 2003 14:51:15 +0200
Received: from iranzo by Deneb.Alufis with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian))
	id 19Kdti-0000Uu-00; Tue, 27 May 2003 14:49:46 +0200
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
From: =?iso-8859-15?q?Pablo_Iranzo_G=F3mez?= <iranzo@Merak.no-ip.org>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <submit@bugs.debian.org>
Subject: openoffice.org: bad date interpretation (today's date)
Reply-To: =?iso-8859-15?q?Pablo_Iranzo_G=F3mez?= <Pablo.Iranzo@uv.es>
X-Mailer: reportbug 2.10.1
Date: Tue, 27 May 2003 14:49:46 +0200
Message-Id: <E19Kdti-0000Uu-00@Deneb.Alufis>
Delivered-To: submit@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0
	tests=BAYES_01,HAS_PACKAGE
	version=2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_05_24
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_05_24 (1.174.2.15-2003-03-30-exp)

Package: openoffice.org
Version: 1.0.3-2
Severity: normal


	In a database, if I try to put today's date, it doesn't accept it and
understands it as 30/12/1899. I've been using this database for years, first
on excel, and then in openoffice since september from 2002, it worked fine.
For adding new lines, I copy the last line, and change date, etc and worked
fine everytime.
	It seems not to accept the number for today (27/5/03) as a valid
date, so it falls to 31/12/1899, rendering dates useless beyond 26/7/03.
	¿Any Idea?
	Thanks in advace

-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
Architecture: i386
Kernel: Linux Deneb.Alufis 2.4.20-openmosix-1 #1 Sun May 4 18:15:11 CEST 2003 i686
Locale: LANG=es_ES@euro, LC_CTYPE=es_ES@euro

Versions of packages openoffice.org depends on:
ii  openoffice.org-bin            1.0.3-2    OpenOffice.org office suite binary
ii  openoffice.org-debian-files   1.0.3-2+1  Debian specific parts of OpenOffic
ii  openoffice.org-l10n-es        1.0.3-2    Spanish language package for openo

-- no debconf information


---------------------------------------
Received: (at 194898-close) by bugs.debian.org; 10 Jun 2003 08:38:02 +0000
>From halls@debian.org Tue Jun 10 03:37:55 2003
Return-path: <halls@debian.org>
Received: from (rover24.cmt) [62.138.132.197] 
	by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
	id 19Pedc-0001yt-00; Tue, 10 Jun 2003 03:37:52 -0500
Received: from shawn (shawn [192.168.60.57])
	by rover24.cmt (Postfix) with ESMTP id 67599C7A2A
	for <194898-close@bugs.debian.org>; Tue, 10 Jun 2003 10:37:50 +0200 (CEST)
Received: by shawn (Postfix, from userid 1050)
	id 6230518C2; Tue, 10 Jun 2003 10:37:45 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Tue, 10 Jun 2003 10:37:45 +0200
From: Chris Halls <halls@debian.org>
To: 194898-close@bugs.debian.org
Subject: Bug#194898: closing as requested by submitter
Message-ID: <20030610083745.GA19356@shawn.thehalls.de>
References: <E19PK4b-0001BJ-00@Deneb.Alufis>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
	protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="8t9RHnE3ZwKMSgU+"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <E19PK4b-0001BJ-00@Deneb.Alufis>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.4i
Delivered-To: 194898-close@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-28.1 required=4.0
	tests=BAYES_20,EMAIL_ATTRIBUTION,IN_REP_TO,PGP_SIGNATURE_2,
	      QUOTED_EMAIL_TEXT,REFERENCES,REPLY_WITH_QUOTES,
	      USER_AGENT_MUTT
	autolearn=ham version=2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_05_24
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_05_24 (1.174.2.15-2003-03-30-exp)


--8t9RHnE3ZwKMSgU+
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Closing the bugreport as requested.

On Mon, Jun 09, 2003 at 12:40:21PM +0200, Pablo Iranzo G=F3mez wrote:
> 	I'm still not able to explain why there was a ' character and why it
> wasn't showed on spreadsheet

Hmm, maybe a problem with upgrading to 1.0.3 from an older version.  Did you
use older versions of OOo before 1.0.3?

Chris

--8t9RHnE3ZwKMSgU+
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQE+5ZjZexmdExmX588RAtOlAJ0XVrxuSRaeYBN1/91B75zaFw1N2QCggdXe
1PT/zcpyHtSNGwTt8j+Izy0=
=AY0R
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--8t9RHnE3ZwKMSgU+--



Reply to: