[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Possible bug



Hi

I tryed to build OOo 1.1beta2 and had some problems with compiling.
My process was this:
- Got .orig.tar.gz from directory of Haggai;
- Extract this in my folder;
- Got oo-deb, branch OO_ORG_1_1, from cvs;
- copy oo-deb/debian -> open...1.1beta2
- verified all deps in debian/control;
- build a project, how are below. I not run a 'dpkg-buildpackage' because this error ocurre in this step too. I use unstable in a k7 .

This is my log:
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
$ debian/rules buildprj PRJ=transex3 DEB_BUILD_OPTIONS=build=-all

dh_testdir
# run dmake with xfvb-run
. build-tree/ooo_1.1beta2_src/LinuxIntelEnv.Set.sh; \
  cd build-tree/ooo_1.1beta2_src/transex3 &&
/home/filho/build/1.1/openoffice.org1.1-1.1beta2/debian/local/scripts/oo-xvfb-run
-a -w 5
XCLASSPATH=$XCLASSPATH::/usr/share/java/crimson.jar:/usr/share/java/xalan.jar:/usr/share/java/xml-apis.jar /home/filho/build/1.1/openoffice.org1.1-1.1beta2/build-tree/ooo_1.1beta2_src/solenv/bin/build.pl -all -dlv link XCLASSPATH=/usr/lib/j2se/1.3/jre/lib/rt.jar:.::/usr/share/java/crimson.jar:/usr/share/java/xalan.jar:/usr/share/java/xml-apis.jar /home/filho/build/1.1/openoffice.org1.1-1.1beta2/build-tree/ooo_1.1beta2_src/solenv/bin/build.pl
-all -dlv link
/home/filho/build/1.1/openoffice.org1.1-1.1beta2/debian/local/scripts/oo-xvfb-run:
line 103:
XCLASSPATH=/usr/lib/j2se/1.3/jre/lib/rt.jar:.::/usr/share/java/crimson.jar:/usr/share/java/xalan.jar:/usr/share/java/xml-apis.jar:
File or directory not found
make: ** [buildprj] Error 127
-------------------------------------------------------------------------

This error ocurre after finished 'bootstrap' target(building of dmake).
I revised all deps and not found nothing mistake . All files, xvfb and .jar files, are in path and accessibles. I requested for two friends to check my work, making in your machines, and they received same error.
Some suggest ?
Thanks in advanced

Claudio





Reply to: