Bug#187305: marked as done (openoffice.org: missing library in soffice.bin?)
Your message dated Thu, 3 Apr 2003 01:11:56 +0200
with message-id <20030402231156.GB2264@rene-engelhard.de>
and subject line Bug#187305: soffice.bin missing library?
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 2 Apr 2003 18:19:44 +0000
>From neil@darlow.co.uk Wed Apr 02 12:19:43 2003
Return-path: <neil@darlow.co.uk>
Received: from pc1-bigg1-4-cust235.lutn.cable.ntl.com (ideal.darlow.co.uk) [81.99.30.235]
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 190mpr-0007MM-00; Wed, 02 Apr 2003 12:19:43 -0600
Received: from neil by ideal.darlow.co.uk with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian))
id 190mpo-0000SG-00; Wed, 02 Apr 2003 19:19:40 +0100
From: Neil Darlow <neil@darlow.co.uk>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <submit@bugs.debian.org>
Subject: openoffice.org: missing library in soffice.bin?
X-Mailer: reportbug 1.50
Date: Wed, 02 Apr 2003 19:19:40 +0100
Message-Id: <[🔎] E190mpo-0000SG-00@ideal.darlow.co.uk>
Sender: Neil Darlow <neil@darlow.co.uk>
Delivered-To: submit@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.2 required=4.0
tests=HAS_PACKAGE,SPAM_PHRASE_00_01
version=2.44
X-Spam-Level:
Package: openoffice.org
Version: 1.0.2-1
Severity: normal
Performing a ldd /usr/lib/openoffice/program/soffice.bin produces the
following output:
libstlport_gcc.so => not found
Is this a problem for operation of openoffice? Debian libstlport4.5
packages don't appear to provide this library so I'm confused.
Regards,
Neil Darlow M.Sc.
-- System Information
Debian Release: testing/unstable
Architecture: i386
Kernel: Linux ideal 2.4.20-epia #1 Thu Jan 16 23:50:49 GMT 2003 i686
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C
Versions of packages openoffice.org depends on:
ii openoffice.org-bin 1.0.2-0woody1 OpenOffice.org office suite binary
ii openoffice.org-debian-file 1.0.2-1+2 Debian specific parts of OpenOffic
ii openoffice.org-l10n-en 1.0.2-1 English (US) language package for
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 187305-done) by bugs.debian.org; 2 Apr 2003 23:14:47 +0000
>From rene@rene-engelhard.de Wed Apr 02 17:14:47 2003
Return-path: <rene@rene-engelhard.de>
Received: from port-212-202-162-221.reverse.qdsl-home.de (boxer) [212.202.162.221]
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 190rRO-0004fg-00; Wed, 02 Apr 2003 17:14:47 -0600
Received: by boxer (Postfix, from userid 1000)
id B5E6A18826; Thu, 3 Apr 2003 01:14:45 +0200 (CEST)
X-IMAP-Sender: rene
Date: Thu, 3 Apr 2003 01:11:56 +0200
From: Rene Engelhard <rene@debian.org>
To: Neil Darlow <neil@darlow.co.uk>, 187305-done@bugs.debian.org
Subject: Re: Bug#187305: soffice.bin missing library?
Message-ID: <20030402231156.GB2264@rene-engelhard.de>
References: <[🔎] 200304022152.h32Lq0tN080419@router.darlow.co.uk>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="H+4ONPRPur6+Ovig"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <[🔎] 200304022152.h32Lq0tN080419@router.darlow.co.uk>
X-Operating-System: Debian GNU/Linux
X-GnuPG-Key: $ finger rene@db.debian.org
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.4i
Delivered-To: 187305-done@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.7 required=4.0
tests=IN_REP_TO,PGP_SIGNATURE_2,QUOTED_EMAIL_TEXT,REFERENCES,
SPAM_PHRASE_00_01,USER_AGENT,USER_AGENT_MUTT
version=2.44
X-Spam-Level:
--H+4ONPRPur6+Ovig
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Hi Neil,
Neil Darlow wrote:
> Mea culpa. It appears libstlport_gcc.so is provided by libstlport4.5-full
> which, following recommendations, I hadn't installed.
>=20
> Does this mean openoffice.org has a missing depends on this package?
No.
You are using 1.0.2-1 which is an old version...
Anyway, this version was compiled using the internal stlport source
shipped in openoffice's source which produces libstlport_gcc.so as
libstlport4.5-full does from openoffice. So OOo's own copy is there
without any dependency on libstlport..
To get no conflicts with the official version (in libstlport packages)
the library is put into /usr/lib/openoffice/program.
You have forgotten to set LD_LIBRARY_PATH to it so it find the library
there.
1.0.2-2 is compiled with the official libstlport packages in Debian.
I am closing that bug report here...
Regards,
Rene
--=20
.''`. Rene Engelhard -- Debian GNU/Linux Developer
: :' : http://www.debian.org | http://people.debian.org/~rene/
`. `' rene@debian.org | GnuPG-Key ID: 248AEB73
`- Fingerprint: 41FA F208 28D4 7CA5 19BB 7AD9 F859 90B0 248A EB73
--H+4ONPRPur6+Ovig
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQE+i248+FmQsCSK63MRAnxxAKCEFxEv6z1xtyrLzXS97oFE/f7WJACeOQc4
U6i06aCFgyYGB8acF/Kki+c=
=Sbpy
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--H+4ONPRPur6+Ovig--
Reply to: