[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#176189: openoffice.org prelinking - is it really much faster?



On Mit, 2003-01-15 at 12:26, Chris Halls wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 11, 2003 at 04:17:50AM +0100, Jan-Hendrik Palic wrote:
> > On Sat, Jan 11, 2003 at 12:10:09AM +0100, Michel Dänzer wrote:
> > >I prelinked the openoffice.org binaries with
> > >
> > >prelink --ld-library-path=/usr/lib/openoffice/program -m /usr/lib/openoffice/
> > >
> > >and it seems to start up significantly faster the first time. It would be
> > >nice if this was done automatically in the background when (new) binaries
> > >got installed, if the prelink package is installed.
> > 
> > The prelinken was one thing, I wanted to look for to speed up
> > OpenOffice.org. 
> > Its already on my todo list.
> 
> Well, I tested the prelinking out and didn't see any significat speedup in
> load time.  And Michael Meeks said..
> 11:12 <@michael_> haggai: when I looked at this the pre-linking page said it wasn't worth doing with a modern ld.so / gcc
> 11:17 <@michael_> haggai: a KDE chap says - "The library loader that comes with SuSE 8.0 has changes which effectively cause the same level of improvement ..."
> 
> Michel, can you provide some statistics to support your claim that it is
> faster when prelinked?

I'll try to come up with that.

> Remember that the first time OOo loads it will take significantly longer 
> whether it is prelinked or not, because the files are not cached in memory.

I know, that's why I said 'the first time'.


-- 
Earthling Michel Dänzer (MrCooper)/ Debian GNU/Linux (powerpc) developer
XFree86 and DRI project member   /  CS student, Free Software enthusiast



Reply to: