[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: oo vs gcc 3.2



Hi .. 

On Mon, Sep 02, 2002 at 10:11:13AM +0200, Chris Halls wrote:
>On Mon, Sep 02, 2002 at 12:41:36AM -0400, Jack Howarth wrote:
>> Jan,
>>    Speaking of mirroring, what is the status of the gcc 3.2 rebuilds
>> of OpenOffice.org 1.0.1? I am rather confused by the state of things
>> as seen from...
>> 
>> http://ftp.freenet.de/pub/ftp.vpn-junkies.de/openoffice/pool/main/stlport/
>> http://ftp.freenet.de/pub/ftp.vpn-junkies.de/openoffice/pool/contrib/openoffice.org/
>> 
>> I see an openoffice.org 1.0.1-5 dsc which claims to Build-Depends g++-3.2
>> yet I don't see a libstlport4.5gcc3.2(-dev) clearly built on gcc 3.2!
>> So while we have powerpc packages for openoffice.org 1.0.1-5 that by
>> their control file must have been built with gcc 3.2 we don't seem 
>> to have gcc 3.2 libstlport4.5 packages built with gcc 3.2. Is that
>> kosher considering that the c++ abi changed between gcc 3.1 and 3.2?
>> Thanks in advance for any clarifications.
>$ ls libstlport4.5gcc3.2*
>libstlport4.5gcc3.2_4.5.3-3_i386.deb  libstlport4.5gcc3.2-dev_4.5.3-3_i386.deb
>
>You're right - I never got any powerpc .debs.  At the time I was expecting
>them to be available to unstable and didn't make sure they were available on
>the mirrors.
>
>Jan, can you upload some please?  I'll update Packages once they are there.

sure .. I will do .. but I deleted the stlport directories yesterday ;(

I rebuild them and upload them ...

	Regards
			Jan
-- 
  .''`.    Jan-Hendrik Palic     |
 : :' : ** Debian GNU/ Linux **  |   ** OpenOffice.org **       ,.. ,..
 `. `'   http://www.debian.org   | http://www.openoffice.org  ,: ..`   `
   `-  jan.palic@linux-debian.de |                           '  `  `

Attachment: pgpqaldZvXlJ6.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Reply to: