On Thu, May 23, 2002 at 08:03:58PM +0200, Martin.Quinson@tuxfamily.org wrote: > Hello, I've sent a mail about a(nother) problem while building. I don't know > wtf I did, and now, it's a bit better. The only remaining pb is the following: > > --- debian/MANIFEST.i386 Tue May 7 16:35:22 2002 > +++ debian/MANIFEST.i386.new Thu May 23 11:20:31 2002 > @@ -225 +224,0 @@ > -usr/lib/openoffice/program/libgcc_s.so.1 > @@ -2537 +2535,0 @@ > -usr/lib/openoffice/share/gnome/net/mathdoc.desktop > MANIFEST check failed; please see debian/README Sorry Martin, I already updated this in CVS, but anoncvs isn't working yet. I've uploaded a new diff version (pre2) to: http://www.mx1.ru/~chris/openoffice/testing This includes the MANIFEST changes, and my first attempt at the arch/nonarch split. I'm not 100% happy with it, because the openoffice.org package is so large (57M down from 62M). I'm thinking maybe it would be better to do this first: openoffice.org-bin (arch-dependant files: about 50M) openoffice.org (all non-arch files, menus, scripts, mime, etc.: about 5-15M) That way, -bin would only need to be uploaded if we patched the source or introduced hotfixes, such as the pspfontcache fix. The smaller package would be uploaded as we worked on the multi-language support, dictionaries, menus, scripts etc. and would gradually get smaller as we took the localised stuff out into seperate packages. Comments? Chris -- Chris Halls | Frankfurt, Germany
Attachment:
pgpd1KSJi6kLt.pgp
Description: PGP signature