[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Problems with .sversion file



Thanks for you help on IRC 

I have a suggestion for changing the /usr/bin/openoffice file if you
have not already covered this.

Currently 

if [ ! -d ~/.openoffice ]; then
  /usr/lib/openoffice/program/setup -R:/etc/openoffice/autoresponse.conf
fi


Could be changed to 

if [ ! -d ~/.openoffice ]; then
  if [ -r ~/.sversionrc ]; then
     mv ~/.sversionrc ~/.sversionrc.orig
  fi
  if [ ! -d ~/.kde2 ]; then
    if [ -d ~/.kde ]; then 
      ln -s ~/.kde ~/.kde2
    else
      mkdir ~/.kde2
    fi
  fi
  /usr/lib/openoffice/program/setup -R:/etc/openoffice/autoresponse.conf
fi

Just a thought. 

I am not on the list so I hope this gets through.

john

aka mohab on the IRC




-- 
John Cooper                     |Phone 0114 223 3052
Your Senior IT Administrator    |Fax   0114 290 9192
Your Communications - Sheffield |email
john.cooper@yourcommunications.co.uk

************************************************************************
Your Communications Ltd
Portland House
Moorfield
Sheffield
S3 8UG

Switchboard number : 0114 290 9090

The information contained in this e-mail is intended only for the
individual to whom it is addressed. It may contain privileged and
confidential information. If you have received this message in error or
there are any problems, please notify the sender immediately and delete
the message from your computer. The unauthorised use, disclosure,
copying or alteration of this message is forbidden. Your Communications
Limited will not be liable for direct, special, indirect or
consequential damage as a result of any virus being passed on, or
arising from alteration of the contents of this message by a third
party.

Your Communications Limited (England and Wales No. 3842309) registered
office Dawson House, Great Sankey, Warrington, WA5 3LW


************************************************************************
Disclaimer end.


Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part


Reply to: