Le samedi 27 septembre 2025 à 09:31 +0200, Rafael Laboissière a écrit : > * Sébastien Villemot <sebastien@debian.org> [2025-09-23 12:30]: > > > Package: release.debian.org > > Severity: normal > > X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-octave@lists.debian.org > > User: release.debian.org@packages.debian.org > > Usertags: transition > > > > Dear Release Team, > > > > Please schedule a transition for the latest major upstream version of Octave, > > version 10. All the arch:any Octave addons need to be rebuild. > > > > Octave 10 has already been uploaded to experimental. > > > > A rebuild of all the packages affected by the transition has been performed. > > Bugs were filed, see: > > https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?tag=octave-10;users=debian-octave@lists.debian.org > > > > All issues but one have fixes ready or even applied. For octave-stk, no > > solution is ready yet, so it will have to temporarily go out of testing. > > > > We stand ready to upload and NMU as needed if other issues arise. > > > > Thanks, > > > > Ben file: > > > > title = "octave-10"; > > is_affected = .depends ~ "octave-abi-59" | .depends ~ "octave-abi-60"; > > is_good = .depends ~ "octave-abi-60"; > > is_bad = .depends ~ "octave-abi-59"; > > Thanks for this work, Sébastien. > > It seems that the transition is finished [*], besides the known issue > with octave-stk. > > Is it time to request the biNMUs? The binNMU have precisely been performed by the Release Team. This is why the table is all green, except for octave-stk. Besides octave-stk, it seems that there is problem with octave- statistics autopkgtests, see: https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/octave -- ⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀ Sébastien Villemot ⣾⠁⢠⠒⠀⣿⡁ Debian Developer ⢿⡄⠘⠷⠚⠋⠀ https://sebastien.villemot.name ⠈⠳⣄⠀⠀⠀⠀ https://www.debian.org
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part