Re: NA and NaN representation on mips64el
>>>>> "RL" == Rafael Laboissière <rafael@debian.org> writes:
RL> could you please provide more information about the patch you mentioned?
i looked at the src (svn trunk), and indeed they continue to use a nan
with a payload of 1954.
but i'm certain that i recall the patch being pushed.
perhaps it was on a branch?
a search thru their mailing list archives would answer it. (the
mailing list is where i read about it.) but i lack access right
now to my archives from back then.
-JimC
--
James Cloos <cloos@jhcloos.com>
OpenPGP: https://jhcloos.com/0x997A9F17ED7DAEA6.asc
Reply to: