On Fri, Mar 02, 2018 at 19:23:06 +0100, Sébastien Villemot wrote: > I think we should adapt the backport to whatever Qt package is in stretch (if > there is no newer in stretch-backports). Ah, thanks. I don't deal with backports much, so I had forgotten what kinds of packaging changes are allowed. For some reason I had it in my head that the exact dependencies had to be satisfied as in unstable. > I plan to do that for Octave 4.2.2 when it goes out, but feel free to update it > earlier. No, I will leave it to the experts, no rush :) -- mike
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature