Hi Thomas, Thomas Weber a écrit , Le 04/08/2014 13:09: > On Fri, Aug 01, 2014 at 12:45:03AM +0200, Gilles Filippini wrote: >> Source: octave >> Version: 3.8.1-3 >> Severity: important >> Tags: patch >> User: pini@debian.org >> Usertags: HDF5-transition >> >> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- >> Hash: SHA256 >> >> Hi, >> >> The hdf5 1.8.13 package in experimental features a new layout for >> headers and libraries, so that all the binary packages are now >> co-installable. > > Thanks for moving forward with this. Just some questions > 1) Should hdf5-flags.patch ad hdf5-mkoctfile.patch be forwarded to upstream? How Debian-specific > are they? These patches aren't Debian-specific. They help when HDF5 is installed into a non standard path. > 2) My understanding of the changes to debian/rules is that we are going > with the serial HDF5 version here for Octave. What if one wants to use > the parallel version in a .oct file (a binary module for Octave)? Will > this be possible? I don't have any knowledge about octave modules. What I can say for sure is that the octave binary packages will be tied to the serial version of HDF5. But nothing should prevent you to link a module against a parallel version of the library. Both instances can coexist into the same application now. Thanks, _g.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature