Your message dated Sat, 15 Mar 2014 19:08:10 -0400 with message-id <20140315230810.GA31619@xps14z.home.local> and subject line Re: Bug#741679: octave: Octave package can't be configured has caused the Debian Bug report #741679, regarding octave: Octave package can't be configured to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 741679: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=741679 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
- To: Debian Bug Tracking System <submit@bugs.debian.org>
- Subject: octave: Octave package can't be configured
- From: wzab <wzab@ise.pw.edu.pl>
- Date: Sat, 15 Mar 2014 15:12:58 +0100
- Message-id: <[🔎] 53245FEA.9040005@ise.pw.edu.pl>
- Reply-to: wzab@ise.pw.edu.pl
Package: octave Version: 3.8.0-5 Severity: important Dear Maintainer, When I try to configure the newest octave, aptitude prints the following error messages: Setting up octave (3.8.0-5) ... error: strcmp: nonconformant cell arrays error: evaluating argument list element number 1 error: called from: error: /usr/share/octave/3.8.0/m/pkg/private/fix_depends.m at line 46, column 9 error: /usr/share/octave/3.8.0/m/pkg/private/get_description.m at line 74, column 18 error: /usr/share/octave/3.8.0/m/pkg/private/rebuild.m at line 50, column 12 error: /usr/share/octave/3.8.0/m/pkg/pkg.m at line 495, column 25 dpkg: error processing package octave (--configure): subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1 dpkg: dependency problems prevent configuration of octave-audio: octave-audio depends on octave (>= 3.8.0); however: Package octave is not configured yet. [...] (a lot of error messages about othe packages depending on octave)*** Reporter, please consider answering these questions, where appropriate **** What led up to the situation? * What exactly did you do (or not do) that was effective (or ineffective)? * What was the outcome of this action? * What outcome did you expect instead? *** End of the template - remove these template lines *** -- System Information: Debian Release: jessie/sid APT prefers testing APT policy: (500, 'testing'), (500, 'stable') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 3.13-1-686-pae (SMP w/2 CPU cores) Locale: LANG=pl_PL.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=pl_PL.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash Versions of packages octave depends on: ii default-jre-headless 2:1.7-51 ii libamd2.3.1 1:4.2.1-3 ii libarpack2 3.1.5-2 ii libatlas3-base [liblapack.so.3] 3.10.1-4 ii libblas3 [libblas.so.3] 1.2.20110419-7 ii libc6 2.18-4 ii libcamd2.3.1 1:4.2.1-3 ii libccolamd2.8.0 1:4.2.1-3 ii libcholmod2.1.2 1:4.2.1-3 ii libcolamd2.8.0 1:4.2.1-3 ii libcxsparse3.1.2 1:4.2.1-3 ii libfftw3-double3 3.3.3-7 ii libfftw3-single3 3.3.3-7 ii libfltk-gl1.3 1.3.2-4 ii libfltk1.3 1.3.2-4 ii libfontconfig1 2.11.0-2 ii libfreetype6 2.5.2-1 ii libgcc1 1:4.8.2-16 ii libgl1-mesa-glx [libgl1] 9.2.2-1 ii libglpk36 4.53-1 ii libglu1-mesa [libglu1] 9.0.0-2 ii libgomp1 4.8.2-16 ii libgraphicsmagick++3 1.3.18-1 ii libgraphicsmagick3 1.3.18-1 ii liblapack3 [liblapack.so.3] 3.5.0-2 ii liboctave2 3.8.0-5 ii libqhull6 2012.1-4 ii libqrupdate1 1.1.2-1 ii libqscintilla2-9 2.7.2-1+b3 ii libqt4-network 4:4.8.5+git209-g718fae5+dfsg-1 ii libqtcore4 4:4.8.5+git209-g718fae5+dfsg-1 ii libqtgui4 4:4.8.5+git209-g718fae5+dfsg-1 ii libstdc++6 4.8.2-16 ii libumfpack5.6.2 1:4.2.1-3 ii libx11-6 2:1.6.2-1 ii octave-common 3.8.0-5 ii texinfo 5.2.0.dfsg.1-2 Versions of packages octave recommends: ii gnuplot-x11 4.6.5-1 ii libatlas3-base 3.10.1-4 ii pstoedit 3.62-1 Versions of packages octave suggests: pn octave-doc <none> ii octave-htmldoc 3.8.0-5 ii octave-info 3.8.0-5 -- no debconf information
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
- To: wzab@ise.pw.edu.pl, 741679-done@bugs.debian.org
- Subject: Re: Bug#741679: octave: Octave package can't be configured
- From: Mike Miller <mtmiller@debian.org>
- Date: Sat, 15 Mar 2014 19:08:10 -0400
- Message-id: <20140315230810.GA31619@xps14z.home.local>
- In-reply-to: <[🔎] 53245FEA.9040005@ise.pw.edu.pl>
- References: <[🔎] 53245FEA.9040005@ise.pw.edu.pl>
On Sat, Mar 15, 2014 at 15:12:58 +0100, wzab wrote: > Package: octave > Version: 3.8.0-5 > Severity: important > > Dear Maintainer, > > When I try to configure the newest octave, aptitude prints the following > error messages: > > Setting up octave (3.8.0-5) ... > error: strcmp: nonconformant cell arrays > error: evaluating argument list element number 1 > error: called from: > error: /usr/share/octave/3.8.0/m/pkg/private/fix_depends.m at line 46, > column 9 > error: /usr/share/octave/3.8.0/m/pkg/private/get_description.m at line 74, > column 18 > error: /usr/share/octave/3.8.0/m/pkg/private/rebuild.m at line 50, column > 12 > error: /usr/share/octave/3.8.0/m/pkg/pkg.m at line 495, column 25 > dpkg: error processing package octave (--configure): > subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1 > dpkg: dependency problems prevent configuration of octave-audio: > octave-audio depends on octave (>= 3.8.0); however: > Package octave is not configured yet. > [...] > (a lot of error messages about othe packages depending on octave) Thanks for your report. This is a duplicate of #740984 and is fixed with octave 3.8.1-1. Please report another bug if this error persists after upgrading to 3.8.1-1 (currently in sid, migrating to testing in another day). -- mikeAttachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
--- End Message ---